Literature DB >> 28863555

Binaural pitch fusion: Pitch averaging and dominance in hearing-impaired listeners with broad fusion.

Yonghee Oh1, Lina A J Reiss1.   

Abstract

Both bimodal cochlear implant and bilateral hearing aid users can exhibit broad binaural pitch fusion, the fusion of dichotically presented tones over a broad range of pitch differences between ears [Reiss, Ito, Eggleston, and Wozny. (2014). J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 15(2), 235-248; Reiss, Eggleston, Walker, and Oh. (2016). J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 17(4), 341-356; Reiss, Shayman, Walker, Bennett, Fowler, Hartling, Glickman, Lasarev, and Oh. (2017). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143(3), 1909-1920]. Further, the fused binaural pitch is often a weighted average of the different pitches perceived in the two ears. The current study was designed to systematically measure these pitch averaging phenomena in bilateral hearing aid users with broad fusion. The fused binaural pitch of the reference-pair tone combination was initially measured by pitch-matching to monaural comparison tones presented to the pair tone ear. The averaged results for all subjects showed two distinct trends: (1) The fused binaural pitch was dominated by the lower-pitch component when the pair tone was either 0.14 octaves below or 0.78 octaves above the reference tone; (2) pitch averaging occurred when the pair tone was between the two boundaries above, with the most equal weighting at 0.38 octaves above the reference tone. Findings from two subjects suggest that randomization or alternation of the comparison ear can eliminate this asymmetry in the pitch averaging range. Overall, these pitch averaging phenomena suggest that spectral distortions and thus binaural interference may arise during binaural stimulation in hearing-impaired listeners with broad fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28863555      PMCID: PMC5648564          DOI: 10.1121/1.4997190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Prediction of speech recognition from audibility in older listeners with hearing loss: effects of age, amplification, and background noise.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kumiko T Boike; Kerry Witherell; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  An objective measurement of the build-up of auditory streaming and of its modulation by attention.

Authors:  Sarah K Thompson; Robert P Carlyon; Rhodri Cusack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Dichotic pitch fusion.

Authors:  G van den Brink; K Sintnicolaas; W S van Stam
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Ann E Perreau; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Abnormal binaural spectral integration in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Rindy A Ito; Jessica L Eggleston; David R Wozny
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-24

8.  Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Pitches of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  P F Assmann; D D Paschall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

2.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Level differences impact the fusion of concurrent vowels dissimilarly within versus across ears.

Authors:  Langchen Fan; Lina A J Reiss; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Children With Normal Hearing, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Curtis L Hartling; Jennifer R Fowler; Gemaine N Stark; Bess Glickman; Morgan Eddolls; Yonghee Oh; Katrina Ramsey; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Binaural Pitch Averaging in Cochlear Implant Users With Broad Binaural Fusion.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Effects of the intensified frequency and time ranges on consonant enhancement in bilateral cochlear implant and hearing aid users.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Carrie Drew
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16

7.  Binaural pitch fusion: Effects of sound level in listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Bess Glickman; Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Effects of Amplitude Modulation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears.

Authors:  Shelby Willis; Brian C J Moore; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.