Literature DB >> 28331007

Advantages of comparative studies in songbirds to understand the neural basis of sensorimotor integration.

Karagh Murphy1, Logan S James2, Jon T Sakata2, Jonathan F Prather3.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor integration is the process through which the nervous system creates a link between motor commands and associated sensory feedback. This process allows for the acquisition and refinement of many behaviors, including learned communication behaviors such as speech and birdsong. Consequently, it is important to understand fundamental mechanisms of sensorimotor integration, and comparative analyses of this process can provide vital insight. Songbirds offer a powerful comparative model system to study how the nervous system links motor and sensory information for learning and control. This is because the acquisition, maintenance, and control of birdsong critically depend on sensory feedback. Furthermore, there is an incredible diversity of song organizations across songbird species, ranging from songs with simple, stereotyped sequences to songs with complex sequencing of vocal gestures, as well as a wide diversity of song repertoire sizes. Despite this diversity, the neural circuitry for song learning, control, and maintenance remains highly similar across species. Here, we highlight the utility of songbirds for the analysis of sensorimotor integration and the insights about mechanisms of sensorimotor integration gained by comparing different songbird species. Key conclusions from this comparative analysis are that variation in song sequence complexity seems to covary with the strength of feedback signals in sensorimotor circuits and that sensorimotor circuits contain distinct representations of elements in the vocal repertoire, possibly enabling evolutionary variation in repertoire sizes. We conclude our review by highlighting important areas of research that could benefit from increased comparative focus, with particular emphasis on the integration of new technologies.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; corollary discharge; learning; sensorimotor; songbird

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28331007      PMCID: PMC5539457          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00623.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  182 in total

1.  Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisons with typically developing age-peers.

Authors:  David J Ertmer; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Social context rapidly modulates the influence of auditory feedback on avian vocal motor control.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Variable sequencing is actively maintained in a well learned motor skill.

Authors:  Timothy L Warren; Jonathan D Charlesworth; Evren C Tumer; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Human mutant huntingtin disrupts vocal learning in transgenic songbirds.

Authors:  Wan-Chun Liu; Jessica Kohn; Sarah K Szwed; Eben Pariser; Sharon Sepe; Bhagwattie Haripal; Naoki Oshimori; Martin Marsala; Atsushi Miyanohara; Ramee Lee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Recurrent interactions between the input and output of a songbird cortico-basal ganglia pathway are implicated in vocal sequence variability.

Authors:  Kosuke Hamaguchi; Richard Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; J H Sandell; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part I--the time period taken to acquire first words and first word combinations.

Authors:  Pauline Nott; Robert Cowan; P Margaret Brown; Gillian Wigglesworth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Learning the microstructure of successful behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan D Charlesworth; Evren C Tumer; Timothy L Warren; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds.

Authors:  Andreas R Pfenning; Erina Hara; Osceola Whitney; Miriam V Rivas; Rui Wang; Petra L Roulhac; Jason T Howard; Morgan Wirthlin; Peter V Lovell; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Jacquelyn Mouncastle; M Arthur Moseley; J Will Thompson; Erik J Soderblom; Atsushi Iriki; Masaki Kato; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang; Trygve Bakken; Angie Bongaarts; Amy Bernard; Ed Lein; Claudio V Mello; Alexander J Hartemink; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Neural Code of Motor Planning and Execution during Goal-Directed Movements in Crows.

Authors:  Paul Rinnert; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effect of Darkness on Intrinsic Motivation for Undirected Singing in Bengalese Finch (Lonchura striata Domestica): A Comparative Study With Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Yunbok Kim; Chihiro Mori; Satoshi Kojima
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  In vivo assessment of the neural substrate linked with vocal imitation accuracy.

Authors:  Julie Hamaide; Kristina Lukacova; Jasmien Orije; Georgios A Keliris; Marleen Verhoye; Annemie Van der Linden
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Neurophysiological coordination of duet singing.

Authors:  Melissa J Coleman; Nancy F Day; Pamela Rivera-Parra; Eric S Fortune
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Manipulations of inhibition in cortical circuitry differentially affect spectral and temporal features of Bengalese finch song.

Authors:  Gaurav R Isola; Anca Vochin; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Song Preference in Female and Juvenile Songbirds: Proximate and Ultimate Questions.

Authors:  Tomoko G Fujii; Austin Coulter; Koedi S Lawley; Jonathan F Prather; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Mechanisms of species diversity in birdsong learning.

Authors:  Sarah Cushing Woolley; Jon Tatsuya Sakata
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Statistical learning for vocal sequence acquisition in a songbird.

Authors:  Logan S James; Herie Sun; Kazuhiro Wada; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.