Literature DB >> 23115179

Variable sequencing is actively maintained in a well learned motor skill.

Timothy L Warren1, Jonathan D Charlesworth, Evren C Tumer, Michael S Brainard.   

Abstract

Variation in sequencing of actions occurs in many natural behaviors, yet how such variation is maintained is poorly understood. We investigated maintenance of sequence variation in adult Bengalese finch song, a learned skill with rendition-to-rendition variation in the sequencing of discrete syllables (i.e., syllable "b" might transition to "c" with 70% probability and to "d" with 30% probability). We found that probabilities of transitions ordinarily remain stable but could be modified by delivering aversive noise bursts following one transition (e.g., "b→c") but not the alternative (e.g., "b→d"). Such differential reinforcement induced gradual, adaptive decreases in probabilities of targeted transitions and compensatory increases in alternative transitions. Thus, the normal stability of transition probabilities does not reflect hardwired premotor circuitry. While all variable transitions could be modified by differential reinforcement, some were less readily modified than others; these were cases that exhibited more alternation between possible transitions than predicted by chance (i.e., "b→d " would tend to follow "b→c " and vice versa). These history-dependent transitions were less modifiable than more stochastic transitions. Similarly, highly stereotyped transitions (which are completely predictable) were not modifiable. This suggests that stochastically generated variability is crucial for sequence modification. Finally, we found that, when reinforcement ceased, birds gradually restored transition probabilities to their baseline values. Hence, the nervous system retains a representation of baseline probabilities and has the impetus to restore them. Together, our results indicate that variable sequencing in a motor skill can reflect an end point of learning that is stably maintained via continual self-monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23115179      PMCID: PMC3752123          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1254-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback.

Authors:  A Leonardo; M Konishi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Postlearning consolidation of birdsong: stabilizing effects of age and anterior forebrain lesions.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  CULTURALLY TRANSMITTED PATTERNS OF VOCAL BEHAVIOR IN SPARROWS.

Authors:  P MARLER; M TAMURA
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning.

Authors:  C Scharff; F Nottebohm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition.

Authors:  Haruo Kasai; Masahiro Fukuda; Satoshi Watanabe; Akiko Hayashi-Takagi; Jun Noguchi
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors.

Authors:  Aaron S Andalman; Michale S Fee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Erratic display as a device against predators.

Authors:  D A Humphries; P M Driver
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Learning the microstructure of successful behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan D Charlesworth; Evren C Tumer; Timothy L Warren; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Vocal experimentation in the juvenile songbird requires a basal ganglia circuit.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Aaron S Andalman; Michale S Fee
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  24 in total

1.  Predicting plasticity: acute context-dependent changes to vocal performance predict long-term age-dependent changes.

Authors:  Logan S James; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural encoding and integration of learned probabilistic sequences in avian sensory-motor circuitry.

Authors:  Kristofer E Bouchard; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Advantages of comparative studies in songbirds to understand the neural basis of sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Karagh Murphy; Logan S James; Jon T Sakata; Jonathan F Prather
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Timing during transitions in Bengalese finch song: implications for motor sequencing.

Authors:  Todd W Troyer; Michael S Brainard; Kristofer E Bouchard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temperature Manipulation in Songbird Brain Implicates the Premotor Nucleus HVC in Birdsong Syntax.

Authors:  Yisi S Zhang; Jason D Wittenbach; Dezhe Z Jin; Alexay A Kozhevnikov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Variability in the temporal parameters in the song of the Bengalese finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica).

Authors:  Ryosuke O Tachibana; Takuya Koumura; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Vocal motor changes beyond the sensitive period for song plasticity.

Authors:  Logan S James; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Auditory-induced neural dynamics in sensory-motor circuitry predict learned temporal and sequential statistics of birdsong.

Authors:  Kristofer E Bouchard; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Manipulations of inhibition in cortical circuitry differentially affect spectral and temporal features of Bengalese finch song.

Authors:  Gaurav R Isola; Anca Vochin; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Variations on a theme: Songbirds, variability, and sensorimotor error correction.

Authors:  B D Kuebrich; S J Sober
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.