Literature DB >> 20689030

Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisons with typically developing age-peers.

David J Ertmer1, Lisa Goffman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The speech production accuracy and variability scores of 6 young cochlear implant (CI) recipients with 2 years of device experience were compared with those of typically developing (TD) age-peers.
METHOD: Words from the First Words Speech Test (FWST; Ertmer, 1999) were imitated 3 times to assess the accuracy and variability of initial consonants, vowels, and words. The initial consonants in the 4 sets of the FWST followed a typical order of development.
RESULTS: The TD group produced targets with high accuracy and low variability. Their scores across FWST sets reflected the expected order of development. The CI group produced most targets less accurately and with more variability than the TD children. Relatively high accuracy for the consonants of Sets 1 and 2 indicated that these phonemes were acquired early and in a typical developmental order. A trend toward greater accuracy for Set 4 as compared with Set 3 suggested that later-emerging consonants were not acquired in the expected order. Variability was greatest for later-emerging initial consonants and whole words. DISCUSSION: Although considerable speech production proficiency was evident, age-level performance was not attained after 2 years of CI experience. Factors that might influence the order of consonant acquisition are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689030      PMCID: PMC3385414          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0165)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  23 in total

1.  Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation.

Authors:  P J Blamey; J G Barry; P Jacq
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Emergence of a vowel system in a young cochlear implant recipient.

Authors:  D J Ertmer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Changes in speech production in a child with a cochlear implant: acoustic and kinematic evidence.

Authors:  Lisa Goffman; David J Ertmer; Christa Erdle
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Incidence of non-rhotic vowel errors in children: data from the Memphis Vowel Project.

Authors:  Karen E Pollock; Mary C Berni
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 5.  Speech perception and spoken word recognition: past and present.

Authors:  Peter W Jusezyk; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The development of auditory perception in children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  T P Nikolopoulos; S M Archbold; G M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Ann E Geers; Chris Brenner; Dianne Altuna; Gretchen Gabbert
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Characteristics of the transition to spoken words in two young cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  David J Ertmer; Kelli J Inniger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Development of functional synergies for speech motor coordination in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Articulatory movements in adolescents: evidence for protracted development of speech motor control processes.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  11 in total

1.  Speech sound production in 2-year-olds who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Sophie E Ambrose; Lauren M Unflat Berry; Elizabeth A Walker; Melody Harrison; Jacob Oleson; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  Advantages of comparative studies in songbirds to understand the neural basis of sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Karagh Murphy; Logan S James; Jon T Sakata; Jonathan F Prather
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Consonant development in pediatric cochlear implant users who were implanted before 30 months of age.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; Ling-Yu Guo
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2012-11-09

4.  Lexical and phonological effects in early word production.

Authors:  Anna V Sosa; Carol Stoel-Gammon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Measuring Speech Production Development in Children With Cerebral Palsy Between 6 and 8 Years of Age: Relationships Among Measures.

Authors:  Phoebe Natzke; Ashley Sakash; Tristan Mahr; Katherine C Hustad
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Emergence of speech sounds between 7 and 24 months of cochlear implant use.

Authors:  Marlene B Salas-Provance; Linda Spencer; Johanna G Nicholas; Emily Tobey
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

7.  The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy; Kayla Kristensen; Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Speech Production Accuracy and Variability in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants: A Comparison to Their Peers With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Anna V Sosa; Ferenc Bunta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Initial Stop Voicing in Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Typically Developing Peers With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Ferenc Bunta; C Elizabeth Goodin-Mayeda; Amanda Procter; Arturo Hernandez
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Training to improve language outcomes in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.