Literature DB >> 28318624

Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.

Marion Morena1, Audrey Jaussent2, Lotfi Chalabi3, Hélène Leray-Moragues4, Leila Chenine4, Alain Debure5, Damien Thibaudin6, Lynda Azzouz7, Laure Patrier8, Francois Maurice9, Philippe Nicoud10, Claude Durand11, Bruno Seigneuric12, Anne-Marie Dupuy13, Marie-Christine Picot2, Jean-Paul Cristol14, Bernard Canaud15.   

Abstract

Large cohort studies suggest that high convective volumes associated with online hemodiafiltration may reduce the risk of mortality/morbidity compared to optimal high-flux hemodialysis. By contrast, intradialytic tolerance is not well studied. The aim of the FRENCHIE (French Convective versus Hemodialysis in Elderly) study was to compare high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration in terms of intradialytic tolerance. In this prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial, 381 elderly chronic hemodialysis patients (over age 65) were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to either high-flux hemodialysis or online hemodiafiltration. The primary outcome was intradialytic tolerance (day 30-day 120). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, cardiovascular risk biomarkers, morbidity, and mortality. During the observational period for intradialytic tolerance, 85% and 84% of patients in high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration arms, respectively, experienced at least one adverse event without significant difference between groups. As exploratory analysis, intradialytic tolerance was also studied, considering the sessions as a statistical unit according to treatment actually received. Over a total of 11,981 sessions, 2,935 were complicated by the occurrence of at least one adverse event, with a significantly lower occurrence in online hemodiafiltration with fewer episodes of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension and muscle cramps. By contrast, health-related quality of life, morbidity, and mortality were not different in both groups. An improvement in the control of metabolic bone disease biomarkers and β2-microglobulin level without change in serum albumin concentration was observed with online hemodiafiltration. Thus, overall outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration over high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.
Copyright © 2017 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular risk biomarkers; chronic kidney disease; hemodiafiltration; intradialytic tolerance; mortality; safety

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28318624     DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  38 in total

1.  Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Jörg Vienken; Stephen Ash; Richard A Ward
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Sodium removal and plasma tonicity balance are not different in hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration using high-flux membranes.

Authors:  Vincenzo La Milia; Chiara Ravasi; Fabio Carfagna; Elena Alberghini; Ivano Baragetti; Laura Buzzi; Francesca Ferrario; Silvia Furiani; Gaia Santagostino Barbone; Giuseppe Pontoriero
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Effects of Hemodiafiltration versus Conventional Hemodialysis in Children with ESKD: The HDF, Heart and Height Study.

Authors:  Rukshana Shroff; Colette Smith; Bruno Ranchin; Aysun K Bayazit; Constantinos J Stefanidis; Varvara Askiti; Karolis Azukaitis; Nur Canpolat; Ayşe Ağbaş; Helen Aitkenhead; Ali Anarat; Bilal Aoun; Daley Aofolaju; Sevcan Azime Bakkaloglu; Devina Bhowruth; Dagmara Borzych-Dużałka; Ipek Kaplan Bulut; Rainer Büscher; John Deanfield; Claire Dempster; Ali Duzova; Sandra Habbig; Wesley Hayes; Shivram Hegde; Saoussen Krid; Christoph Licht; Mieczyslaw Litwin; Mark Mayes; Sevgi Mir; Rose Nemec; Lukasz Obrycki; Fabio Paglialonga; Stefano Picca; Charlotte Samaille; Mohan Shenoy; Manish D Sinha; Brankica Spasojevic; Lynsey Stronach; Enrico Vidal; Karel Vondrák; Alev Yilmaz; Ariane Zaloszyc; Michel Fischbach; Claus Peter Schmitt; Franz Schaefer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Haemodialysis.

Authors:  Damien Ashby; Natalie Borman; James Burton; Richard Corbett; Andrew Davenport; Ken Farrington; Katey Flowers; James Fotheringham; R N Andrea Fox; Gail Franklin; Claire Gardiner; R N Martin Gerrish; Sharlene Greenwood; Daljit Hothi; Abdul Khares; Pelagia Koufaki; Jeremy Levy; Elizabeth Lindley; Jamie Macdonald; Bruno Mafrici; Andrew Mooney; James Tattersall; Kay Tyerman; Enric Villar; Martin Wilkie
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 5.  Single needle hemodialysis: is the past the future?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 6.  Choices in hemodialysis therapies: variants, personalized therapy and application of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Stefano Stuard; Frank Laukhuf; Grace Yan; Maria Ines Gomez Canabal; Paik Seong Lim; Michael A Kraus
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

7.  Reappraisal of Hemodiafiltration for Managing Uremic Complications.

Authors:  Muriel Grooteman; Menso Nubé
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 10.614

Review 8.  Reconsidering adsorption in hemodialysis: is it just an epiphenomenon? A narrative review.

Authors:  Nans Florens; Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher; L Juillard
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.902

9.  Cardiovascular Risk Comparison between Expanded Hemodialysis Using Theranova and Online Hemodiafiltration (CARTOON): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yeonhee Lee; Myoung-Jin Jang; Junseok Jeon; Jung Eun Lee; Wooseong Huh; Bum Soon Choi; Cheol Whee Park; Ho Jun Chin; Chae Lin Kang; Dong Ki Kim; Seung Seok Han; Kwon Wook Joo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A comparative analysis of high-flux and low-flux dialysis in cervical cancer patients with obstructive renal failure showing no significantly improved renal function after catheterisation.

Authors:  Chen-Li Zhang; De-Qiong Xie; Li-Na Ao; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.