Literature DB >> 29511057

Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients.

Bernard Canaud1,2, Jörg Vienken3, Stephen Ash4,5,6, Richard A Ward.   

Abstract

Hemodiafiltration combines diffusive and convective solute removal in a single therapy by ultrafiltering 20% or more of the blood volume processed using a high-flux hemodialyzer and maintaining fluid balance by infusing sterile nonpyrogenic replacement fluid directly into the patient's blood. In online hemodiafiltration, the large volumes of replacement fluid required are obtained by online filtration of standard dialysate through a series of bacteria- and endotoxin-retaining filters. Currently available systems for online hemodiafiltration are on the basis of conventional dialysis machines with added features to safely prepare and infuse replacement fluid and closely control fluid balance. Hemodiafiltration provides greater removal of higher molecular weight uremic retention solutes than conventional high-flux hemodialysis, and recently completed randomized, controlled clinical trials suggest better patient survival with online hemodiafiltration compared with standard high-flux hemodialysis when a high convection volume is delivered. Hemodiafiltration is also associated with improvements in other clinical outcomes, such as a reduction in intradialytic hypotension, and it is now used routinely to treat >100,000 patients, mainly in Europe and Japan.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Blood Volume; Clinical outcomes; Convection; Dialysis Solutions; Endotoxins; Europe; Filtration; Hemodiafiltration; Humans; Japan; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidneys, Artificial; Molecular Weight; Technical requirements; Therapy prescription; hypotension; renal dialysis; ultrafiltration; water-electrolyte balance

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511057      PMCID: PMC6140578          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12631117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  56 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Expectation of Online Hemodiafiltration: A Japanese Perspective.

Authors:  Tadao Akizawa; Fumihiko Koiwa
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Microbiological quality and quality control of purified water and ultrapure dialysis fluids for online hemodiafiltration in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  E Lars Penne; Linda Visser; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Neelke C van der Weerd; Albert H A Mazairac; Brigit C van Jaarsveld; Marion G Koopman; Pieter Vos; Geert W Feith; Ton K Kremer Hovinga; Henk W van Hamersvelt; Inge M Wauters; Michiel L Bots; Menso J Nubé; Piet M Ter Wee; Peter J Blankestijn; Muriel P C Grooteman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatments. The Registro Lombardo Dialisi E Trapianto.

Authors:  F Locatelli; D Marcelli; F Conte; A Limido; F Malberti; D Spotti
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Leptin and beta2-microglobulin kinetics with three different dialysis modalities.

Authors:  S Mandolfo; S Borlandelli; E Imbasciati
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.595

5.  Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS.

Authors:  B Canaud; J L Bragg-Gresham; M R Marshall; S Desmeules; B W Gillespie; T Depner; P Klassen; F K Port
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Utilization of hemodiafiltration as treatment modality in renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease patients--a global perspective.

Authors:  Jan-Michael Sichart; Stefan Moeller
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 1.580

7.  On-line hemodiafiltration reduces the proinflammatory CD14+CD16+ monocyte-derived dendritic cells: A prospective, crossover study.

Authors:  Julia Carracedo; Ana Merino; Sonia Nogueras; Diana Carretero; Isabel Berdud; Rafael Ramírez; Ciro Tetta; Mariano Rodríguez; Alejandro Martín-Malo; Pedro Aljama
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Outcomes of hemodiafiltration based on Japanese dialysis patient registry.

Authors:  S Nakai; K Iseki; K Tabei; K Kubo; I Masakane; K Fushimi; K Kikuchi; T Shinzato; T Sanaka; T Akiba
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Convective versus diffusive dialysis therapies for chronic kidney failure: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ionut Nistor; Suetonia C Palmer; Jonathan C Craig; Valeria Saglimbene; Mariacristina Vecchio; Adrian Covic; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Short-term effects of online hemodiafiltration on phosphate control: a result from the randomized controlled Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST).

Authors:  E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Muriel P C Grooteman; Renée Lévesque; Menso J Nubé; Michiel L Bots; Peter J Blankestijn; Piet M ter Wee
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  16 in total

1.  Regulatory Considerations for Hemodiafiltration in the United States.

Authors:  Richard A Ward; Jörg Vienken; Douglas M Silverstein; Stephen Ash; Bernard Canaud
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Global Dialysis Perspective: France.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Cecile Couchoud
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-10-25

3.  Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Asymmetricity of Dialysis Membrane Using Forward and Backward Ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Akihiro C Yamashita; Toshiki Kakee; Takahisa Ono; Jun Motegi; Satoru Yamaguchi; Takashi Sunohara
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 4.  Cardiovascular risk factors in children on dialysis: an update.

Authors:  Uwe Querfeld; Franz Schaefer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Online hemodiafilteration use in children: a single center experience with a twist.

Authors:  Magid A A Ibrahim; Ihab Z ElHakim; Dina Soliman; Muhammad A Mubarak; Ragia M Said
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  The Impact of Vascular Access Types on Hemodialysis Patient Long-term Survival.

Authors:  Li-Mei Yeh; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Ping-Chin Lai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Differences in Dialysis Efficacy Have Limited Effects on Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins Plasma Levels over Time.

Authors:  Detlef H Krieter; Simon Kerwagen; Marieke Rüth; Horst-Dieter Lemke; Christoph Wanner
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  High-volume online haemodiafiltration treatment and outcome of end-stage renal disease patients: more than one mode.

Authors:  Helmut Schiffl
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Clinical evidence on haemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Peter J Blankestijn; Muriel P Grooteman; Menso J Nube; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 10.  The current and future landscape of dialysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Himmelfarb; Raymond Vanholder; Rajnish Mehrotra; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 28.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.