Literature DB >> 31538312

Single needle hemodialysis: is the past the future?

Raymond Vanholder1.   

Abstract

Whereas the usual way to gain access to the vascular bed for hemodialysis is by inserting two needles, an alternative option based on the introduction of only one needle has been available for several decades. Although single needle hemodialysis gradually lost popularity in the early nineties of last century, this option now seems to make a come-back, with the current change in patient mix towards more elderly and cardio-vascular disease and the appearance of more flexible hardware. Single needle hemodialysis offers several advantages, such as the possibility to puncture small or maturing access systems, a decrease in number of punctures with less potential access damage and subsequent complications, the avoidance of central vein catheter use, and an improved quality of life by reducing puncture-related pain, stress and complications. The main drawback is recirculation which however can be overcome (if considered necessary) by making dialysis somewhat longer and in addition has more impact on removal of small water soluble compounds than on clearance of the more toxic difficult to remove solutes (middle molecules and protein bound compounds). Effective dialyzer blood flow with single needle dialysis cannot be much higher than 300 mL/min, which however also offers advantages by making short dialysis sessions less feasible and thus reducing the likelihood of intradialytic blood pressure falls, organ stunning and other negative outcomes of shorter dialysis. Direct outcome comparisons between single and double needle dialysis are not available but indirect data suggest no differences, in as far as efficient enough access perfusion can keep dialyzer blood flow adequate. The single needle method seems especially suited for the elderly and for home hemodialysis. Recent technological improvements have made the system more accessible and adequate, but further studies are needed to assess with modern methodologies the clearance kinetics of these systems, which could emanate in further technological fine-tuning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central vein catheter; Double needle; Hemodialysis; Home hemodialysis; Single needle

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31538312     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-019-00644-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  65 in total

1.  In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Nathan W Levin; Gerald J Beck; Thomas A Depner; Paul W Eggers; Jennifer J Gassman; Irina Gorodetskaya; Tom Greene; Sam James; Brett Larive; Robert M Lindsay; Ravindra L Mehta; Brent Miller; Daniel B Ornt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Anjay Rastogi; Michael V Rocco; Brigitte Schiller; Olga Sergeyeva; Gerald Schulman; George O Ting; Mark L Unruh; Robert A Star; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The new European Renal Best Practice guideline on arteriovenous access: why worthwhile to read.

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Wim Van Biesen; Jonathan G Fox; Evi V Nagler
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 3.  Once upon a time in dialysis: the last days of Kt/V?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Vascular Access Outcomes Reported in Maintenance Hemodialysis Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea K Viecelli; Emma O'Lone; Benedicte Sautenet; Jonathan C Craig; Allison Tong; Eric Chemla; Lai-Seong Hooi; Timmy Lee; Charmaine Lok; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Robert R Quinn; Tushar Vachharajani; Raymond Vanholder; Li Zuo; Ashley B Irish; Trevor A Mori; Elaine M Pascoe; David W Johnson; Carmel M Hawley
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Analysis of recirculation in single-needle haemodialysis.

Authors:  J H Meijer; J P Reulen; H Schneider; P L Oe; M I Koolen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Long-term experience with routine single-needle dialysis. A review.

Authors:  R Vanholder; N Hoenich; A M Bogaert; S Ringoir
Journal:  ASAIO Trans       Date:  1986 Jul-Sep

7.  Longer treatment time and slower ultrafiltration in hemodialysis: associations with reduced mortality in the DOPPS.

Authors:  R Saran; J L Bragg-Gresham; N W Levin; Z J Twardowski; V Wizemann; A Saito; N Kimata; B W Gillespie; C Combe; J Bommer; T Akiba; D L Mapes; E W Young; F K Port
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Free heme toxicity and its detoxification systems in human.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Uday Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  Impact of single-needle therapy in new chronic hemodialysis starts for individuals with arteriovenous fistulae.

Authors:  Barbara Wilson; Lori Harwood; Bonita Thompson
Journal:  CANNT J       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun

10.  Phosphate kinetics during high-flux hemodialysis.

Authors:  C A DeSoi; J G Umans
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  1 in total

1.  Single Lumen Alternating Micro-Batch Hemodiafiltration (SLAMB-HDF): A Device for Minimally Invasive Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Lakhmir S Chawla
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-07-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.