Literature DB >> 33837932

Reconsidering adsorption in hemodialysis: is it just an epiphenomenon? A narrative review.

Nans Florens1,2, Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher3,4, L Juillard3,4.   

Abstract

Since the first attempt at extracorporeal renal replacement therapy, renal replacement therapy has been constantly improved. In the field of hemodialysis, substantial efforts have been made to improve toxin removal and biocompatibility. The advent of hemodiafiltration (HDF) and, more recently, of mid cut-off membranes have contributed to management of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although several uremic toxins have been discovered, we know little about the clinical impact of their clearance in hemodialysis patients. In addition, a great deal of progress has been made in the areas of filtration and diffusion, but the adsorptive properties of hemodialysis membranes remain under-studied. The mechanism of action of adsorption is based on the attraction between the polymer of the dialysis membrane and the solutes, through hydrophobic interactions, ionic or electrostatic forces, hydrogen bonds or van der Waals forces. Adsorption on the dialysis membrane depends on the membrane surface, pore size, structure and electric load. Its involvement in toxin removal and biocompatibility is significant, and is not just an epiphenomenon. Diffusive and convective properties cannot be improved indefinitely and high permeability membranes, despite their high performance in the clearance of many toxins, have several limitations for long-term use in hemodialysis. This review will discuss why adsorption should be reconsidered and better characterized to improve efficiency and adequacy of dialysis.
© 2021. Italian Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Dialysis adequacy; Dialysis membrane; Hemodialysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837932     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-00993-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  38 in total

1.  Specific adsorption of some complement activation proteins to polysulfone dialysis membranes during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jan Mares; Visith Thongboonkerd; Zdenek Tuma; Jiri Moravec; Martin Matejovic
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Proteomic analysis of serum, outflow dialysate and adsorbed protein onto dialysis membranes (polysulfone and pmma) during hemodialysis treatment using SELDI-TOF-MS.

Authors:  Isao Ishikawa; Yoshihiro Chikazawa; Kazumasa Sato; Masaru Nakagawa; Hidetsugu Imamura; Satoshi Hayama; Hideki Yamaya; Mitsuhiro Asaka; Naohisa Tomosugi; Hitoshi Yokoyama; Keiji Matsumoto
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.754

3.  Effects on inflammatory and nutritional markers of haemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate (HFR) vs online haemodiafiltration: a cross-over randomized multicentre trial.

Authors:  Vincenzo Panichi; Giovanni Manca-Rizza; Sabrina Paoletti; Daniele Taccola; Cristina Consani; Cristina Filippi; Emanuela Mantuano; Antonino Sidoti; Giovanni Grazi; Alessandro Antonelli; Daniela Angelini; Isabella Petrone; Carlo Mura; Patricia Tolaini; Franco Saloi; Paolo M Ghezzi; Giuliano Barsotti; Roberto Palla
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.

Authors:  Marion Morena; Audrey Jaussent; Lotfi Chalabi; Hélène Leray-Moragues; Leila Chenine; Alain Debure; Damien Thibaudin; Lynda Azzouz; Laure Patrier; Francois Maurice; Philippe Nicoud; Claude Durand; Bruno Seigneuric; Anne-Marie Dupuy; Marie-Christine Picot; Jean-Paul Cristol; Bernard Canaud
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 5.  Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Ionut Nistor; Suetonia C Palmer; Jonathan C Craig; Valeria Saglimbene; Mariacristina Vecchio; Adrian Covic; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-20

6.  Increases in mass transfer-area coefficients and urea Kt/V with increasing dialysate flow rate are greater for high-flux dialyzers.

Authors:  J K Leypoldt; A K Cheung
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Hemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate: effect on heme-oxygenase-1 and inducible subunit of nitric oxide synthase and implication for oxidative stress and inflammation.

Authors:  Lorenzo A Calò; Agostino Naso; Paul A Davis; Elisa Pagnin; Robert Corradini; Adalberto Tommasi; Luisa Sereni; Eugenio Ragazzi
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.094

8.  Proteomic analysis of proteins bound to adsorption units of extracorporeal liver support system under clinical conditions.

Authors:  Jan Mares; Visith Thongboonkerd; Zdenek Tuma; Jiri Moravec; Thomas Karvunidis; Martin Matejovic
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Effect of a hemodiafiltration session with on-line regeneration of the ultrafiltrate on oxidative stress. Comparative study with conventional hemodialysis with polysulfone.

Authors:  B González-Diez; M Cavia; G Torres; P Abaigar; P Muñiz
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  [A medical "odyssey" in a congenital unilateral diaphragm defect].

Authors:  W Schäfer; F Hanstein; E Schumann
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 0.942

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Membranes for Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy.

Authors:  Mario Bonomini; Luca Piscitani; Lorenzo Di Liberato; Vittorio Sirolli
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.