Literature DB >> 30628020

Sodium removal and plasma tonicity balance are not different in hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration using high-flux membranes.

Vincenzo La Milia1, Chiara Ravasi2, Fabio Carfagna2, Elena Alberghini3, Ivano Baragetti3, Laura Buzzi3, Francesca Ferrario3, Silvia Furiani3, Gaia Santagostino Barbone3, Giuseppe Pontoriero2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus high-flux membranes hemodialysis (hf-HD) are still debated. In fact, although a superiority of one treatment over the other, especially in terms of mortality, did not emerge from the analysis of clinical trials, improved intradialytic vascular stability and cardiovascular mortality have been observed in patients undergoing HDF rather than hf-HD; the lower removal of sodium (Na+) during HDF seems to play a major role. The plasma concentration of Na+ is the major determinant of plasma tonicity, which, by determining the flow of water between the intracellular and the extracellular compartment, contributes to the vascular refilling process and the maintenance of blood pressure during the hemodialysis treatment. Plasma tonicity also depends on plasma glucose concentration, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus with hyperglycaemia at the start of hemodialysis treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the removal of Na+ and plasma tonicity balance during a 2-week period by performing 2-3 consecutive sessions of hf-HD followed by 2-3 consecutive sessions of HDF, or vice versa, in 47 patients (40% diabetics) on chronic hemodialysis. Identical parameters were used in all dialytic sessions.
RESULTS: Na+ removal per session was - 224 ± 144 mmol and - 219 ± 152 mmol, respectively, in hf-HD and in HDF (p = 0.79). The plasma tonicity balance per session was - 575 ± 310 mOsm and - 563 ± 328 mOsm, respectively, in hf-HD and in HDF (p = 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: The removal of Na+ and plasma tonicity balance did not differ between hf-HD and HDF. This observation suggests that factors other than those assessed in our study might explain the improved cardiovascular stability reported in HDF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodiafiltration; Hemodialysis; High-flux membranes; Plasma tonicity balance; Sodium removal

Year:  2019        PMID: 30628020     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-00581-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  36 in total

1.  The influence of different glucose concentrations in haemodialysis solutions on metabolism and blood pressure stability in diabetic patients.

Authors:  S Simic-Ogrizovic; G Backus; A Mayer; J Vienken; L Djukanovic; W Kleophas
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.595

2.  Haemodiafiltration in high-cardiovascular-risk patients.

Authors:  M Mion; P G Kerr; A Argiles; B Canaud; J L Flavier; C M Mion
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Internal hemodiafiltration versus low-flux bicarbonate dialysis: Results from a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  Marco Righetti; Oliviero Filiberti; Andrea Ranghino; Gianmichele Ferrario; Silvana Milani; Paola Serbelloni; Gian Enrico Guida; Adalberto Tommasi
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.595

4.  A new semiempirical mathematical model for prediction of internal filtration in hollow fiber hemodialyzers.

Authors:  Gianfranco B Fiore; Gualtiero Guadagni; Andrea Lupi; Zaccaria Ricci; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Paolo Altieri; Simeone Andrulli; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Giovanna Sau; Luciano A Pedrini; Carlo Basile; Salvatore David; Mariano Feriani; Giovanni Montagna; Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio; Bruno Memoli; Raffaella Cravero; Giovanni Battaglia; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Change from conventional haemodiafiltration to on-line haemodiafiltration.

Authors:  F Maduell; C del Pozo; H Garcia; L Sanchez; J Hdez-Jaras; M D Albero; C Calvo; I Torregrosa; V Navarro
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Effect of sodium balance and the combination of ultrafiltration profile during sodium profiling hemodialysis on the maintenance of the quality of dialysis and sodium and fluid balances.

Authors:  Joon Ho Song; Geun Ho Park; Sun Young Lee; Seung Won Lee; Seoung Woo Lee; Moon-Jae Kim
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Sodium modeling in hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  L A Pedrini; R Ponti; P Faranna; G Cozzi; F Locatelli
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Clinical evaluation of internal hemodiafiltration (iHDF): a diffusive-convective technique performed with internal filtration enhanced high-flux dialyzers.

Authors:  L Lucchi; G B Fiore; G Guadagni; S Perrone; V Malaguti; F Caruso; R Fumero; A Albertazzi
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.595

10.  Reduction of hypotensive side effects during online-haemodiafiltration and low temperature haemodialysis.

Authors:  Johannes Donauer; Christoph Schweiger; Brigitta Rumberger; Bernd Krumme; Joachim Böhler
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is high-volume post-dilution haemodiafiltration associated with risk of fluid volume imbalance? A national multicentre cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Charles Chazot; Sebastien Deleuze; Baya Fadel; Hadia Hebibi; Guillaume Jean; Martial Levannier; Olivier Puyoo; David Attaf; Stefano Stuard; Bernard Canaud
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.992

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.