Literature DB >> 28311376

Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees.

Lawrence D Harder1.   

Abstract

Fluid viscosity only affected ingestion rates of bumble bees (Bombus) for solutions greater than 35-40% sucrose (mass of solute per mass of solution). This contrasts with previously published models based on fluid dynamics which predicted continuous depression of ingestion rates with increasing viscosity. Individual bees maintained constant lapping rates regardless of sucrose concentration (up to at least 70%). The decline in ingestion rates at higher concentrations apparently resulted from the tongue not contacting liquid long enough to become saturated due to reduced capillary flow. Increasing flower depth similarly decreased the volume of liquid ingested per lap, and did not affect lapping rate. Morphologically dissimilar bees drank at different rates because glossa length affects lapping rate and volume ingested per lap, and body mass affects lapping rate. An additional species-specific component to lapping rate also influenced ingestion rates. Deviations from a regression model derived to explain ingestion rates as a function of glossa length, body mass, flower depth and liquid viscosity suggest mechanistic and behavioralaspects to flower probing time. Because of the relation between ingestion rate and liquid viscosity, the sucrose concentration maximizing a bee's rate of net energy uptake should lie between 50-65%, depending primarily on specific conditions of nectar volume, inflorescence size and flight time between inflorescences.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 28311376     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Nectar extraction by hummingbirds: response to different floral characters.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Flower handling efficiency of bumble bees: morphological aspects of probing time.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior.

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver; Thomas L Daniel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Kenneth A Pivnick; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species.

Authors:  P G May
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences.

Authors:  G H Pyke
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Incentive contrast in honey bees.

Authors:  M E Bitterman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Nectar Characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds.

Authors:  F Reed Haisworth; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Coevolution of foraging in bombus and nectar dispensing in chilopsis: a last dreg theory.

Authors:  T G Whitham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D C Paton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nectar intake rate is modulated by changes in sucking pump activity according to colony starvation in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Agustina Falibene; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The interaction of temperature and sucrose concentration on foraging preferences in bumblebees.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Adrian Dyer; Lars Chittka; Sean A Rands; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-04

4.  Interpreting patterns of resource utilization: randomness and selectivity in pollen feeding by adult hoverflies.

Authors:  J R Haslett
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the "quantity" component in a plant-pollinator system.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Elevated carbon dioxide increases nectar production in Epilobium angustifolium L.

Authors:  Andreas Erhardt; Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Jürg Stöcklin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Adaptation for rodent pollination in Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) despite rapid pollen loss during grooming.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Johnson; Anton Pauw
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  The mechanics of nectar offloading in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and implications for optimal concentrations during nectar foraging.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; Hamish A Symington; Walter Federle; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Ambient temperature influences Australian native stingless bee (Trigona carbonaria) preference for warm nectar.

Authors:  Melanie Norgate; Skye Boyd-Gerny; Vera Simonov; Marcello G P Rosa; Tim A Heard; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community.

Authors:  A Canto; C M Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.