Literature DB >> 28310488

Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior.

Joel G Kingsolver1, Thomas L Daniel2.   

Abstract

To explore the mechanical determinants of feeding strategies for nectar feeders, we develop a fluid dynamical and behavioral model describing the mechanics and energetics of capillary feeding in hummingbirds. Behavioral and morphological data for Calypte and Archilochus are used to test and illustrate this model. We emphasize the important differences between capillary and suction mechanisms of fluid feeding. Model predictions of nectar intake rates and nectar volumes per lick are consistent with observed values for Calypte anna. The optimal nectar concentration maximizing rate of energy intake depends on tongue morphology and licking behavior. For hummingbirds exhibiting optimal licking behavior, the optimal nectar concentration is 35-40% sucrose for feeding on large nectar volumes. For small nectar volumes, the optimal concentration is 20-25%. The model also identifies certain tongue morphologies and licking frequencies maximizing energy intake, that are consistent with available observations on licking behavior and tongue design in nectar feeding birds. These predictions differ qualitatively from previous results for suction feeding in butterflies.The model predicts that there is a critical food canal radius above which suction feeding is superior to capillary feeding in maximizing the rate of energy intake; the tongues of most hummingbirds and sunbirds fall above this critical radius. The development of suction feeding by nectarivorous birds may be constrained by the elastic properties of their flexible tongues. Our results show that, in terms of morphology, scaling, and energetics, different mechanisms of feeding on the same food resource can lead to qualitatively different predictions about optimal design and feeding strategies.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 28310488     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  THE TONGUE APPARATUS IN HUMMINGBIRDS.

Authors:  R D WEYMOUTH; R C LASIEWSKI; A J BERGER
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1964

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies.

Authors:  J G Kingsolver; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Cross-sectional shape of collapsible tubes.

Authors:  E Kresch; A Noordergraaf
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Feeding strategy and the mechanics of blood sucking in insects.

Authors:  T L Daniel; J G Kingsolver
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  On the tongue of a hummingbird: its role in the rate and energetics of feeding.

Authors:  F R Hainsworth
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1973-09-01

8.  On the temperature-dependency of optimal nectar concentrations for birds.

Authors:  W A Calder
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Nectar Characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds.

Authors:  F Reed Haisworth; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D C Paton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Living in a physical world X. Pumping fluids through conduits.

Authors:  Steven Vogel
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Evolutionary associations between nectar properties and specificity in bird pollination systems.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Nectar intake rate is modulated by changes in sucking pump activity according to colony starvation in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Agustina Falibene; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Trade-offs between sexual and asexual reproduction in the genus Mimulus.

Authors:  S Sutherland; R K Vickery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Mechanical determinants of nectar-feeding energetics in butterflies: muscle mechanics, feeding geometry, and functional equivalence.

Authors:  Thomas L Daniel; Joel G Kingsolver; Edgar Meyhöfer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Hummingbirds as net rate maximisers.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; David C Krakauer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Energy intake rates and nectar concentration preferences by hummingbirds.

Authors:  Staffan Tamm; Clifton Lee Gass
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.