Literature DB >> 28310487

Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Amy J Heyneman1.   

Abstract

A model is developed to elucidate the determinants of sugar concentrations in flower nectars. This model analyses the efficiency of sugar intake, or energy flux, which for nectarivores closely approximates the rate of net energy gain. For both steady state and some non-steady flows of nectars, this energy flux is shown to be maximal at particular sugar concentrations referred to here as the maximum flux concentration. Higher concentrations actually yield lower energy intake rates because the concomitant rapid increase in viscosity sharply reduces the rate of fluid intake. For pure sucrose solutions, the maximum flux concentration is 22%. For flower nectars, which are chemically more complex, the maximum flux concentration is predicted to be closer to 26%, using the first viscosity measures obtained for flower nectars. This concentration is shown to be essentially independent of the pollinator's feeding organ morphology and of the type of potential inducing nectar flow. It is proposed that this concentration applies for virtually all pollinators that select nectars with maximal energy flux.However not all pollinators are expected to select such nectars because this 26% concentration is not necessarily "optimal". The model predicts that optimal sugar concentrations vary for particular pollinators as a function of two primary factors: (1) the energy flux derived from the nectar, as discussed above, as well as (2) the relative contribution of transit costs to overall foraging costs. Relatively "dilute" nectars, with sugar concentrations close to the maximal flux value, are predicted for flowers pollinated by organisms that minimize feeding time to reduce high feeding costs, such as that of hovering or of exposure to enhanced predation while feeding. More concentrated nectars are predicted for flowers pollinated by nectarivores that incur high foraging transit costs relative to feeding costs.Flowers pollinated by hovering pollinators, including many hummingbirds, hawkmoths and bats, have nectars with mean sugar concentrations in close accord with the 26% maximum flux concentration predicted. Moreover, these nectars have relatively low concentrations of nonsugar constituents, which increase viscosity and thereby decrease sugar flux. Over 75% of the flowers examined in this study, which are pollinated primarily by territorial hummingbird species, provide nectars that allow sugar uptake with an efficiency of 90% or greater of the maximal value. According to the model, these data suggest that feeding costs of these pollinators far outweigh foraging transit costs. In contrast, the model suggests that flower nectars taken by traplining hummingbirds and by bees, with sugar concentrations significantly above the maximum flux value, reflect the higher costs of foraging flight relative to costs of feeding for these pollinators.Increasing temperature decreases nectar viscosity, and thereby increases absolute nectar uptake rates sharply. This leads to a number of predictions regarding foraging behavior as well as flower location, orientation, and color. However, the maximum flux concentration is shown to be practically invariable over a wide range of temperatures-increasing by only 2% sugar from 10°C to 30°C. Thus, contrary to previous expectations, little change in average sugar concentrations of flowers pollinated by particular groups of nectarivores is expected from cooler to warmer regions.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 28310487     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Energetics of foraging: rate and efficiency of nectar extraction by hummingbirds.

Authors:  L L Wolf; F R Hainsworth; F G Stiles
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar robbers.

Authors:  P G Willmer; S A Corbet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar.

Authors:  Alan B Bolten; Peter Feinsinger; Herbert G Baker; Irene Baker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effects of insect visitors on nectar constituents in temperate plants.

Authors:  P G Willmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior.

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver; Thomas L Daniel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  On the temperature-dependency of optimal nectar concentrations for birds.

Authors:  W A Calder
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Calculation of density and viscosity of sucrose solutions as a function of concentration and temperature.

Authors:  E J Barber
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1966-06

9.  Nectar Characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds.

Authors:  F Reed Haisworth; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Ovarian Dynamics in Heliconiine Butterflies: Programmed Senescence versus Eternal Youth.

Authors:  H Dunlap-Pianka; C L Boggs; L E Gilbert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  26 in total

1.  Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D C Paton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nectar intake rate is modulated by changes in sucking pump activity according to colony starvation in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Agustina Falibene; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Trade-offs between sexual and asexual reproduction in the genus Mimulus.

Authors:  S Sutherland; R K Vickery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Nectar extraction by hummingbirds: response to different floral characters.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Energy intake rates and nectar concentration preferences by hummingbirds.

Authors:  Staffan Tamm; Clifton Lee Gass
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The role of insect water balance in pollination ecology: Xylocopa and Calotropis.

Authors:  P G Willmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior.

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver; Thomas L Daniel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Kenneth A Pivnick; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species.

Authors:  P G May
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.