Literature DB >> 28312171

Interpreting patterns of resource utilization: randomness and selectivity in pollen feeding by adult hoverflies.

J R Haslett1.   

Abstract

Adult syrphid flies feed primarily on pollen and nectar from flowers and may be regarded as suitable models for the investigation of resource partitioning in a plant/pollinator system. The present study examines the extent to which a small group of six species are selective in their diets and investigates the role of flower colour as a means by which such selectivity may occur. Flower feeding preferences were determined by pollen analyses of gut contents and an extensive flower sampling programme was under-taken to provide information on the relative abundances of the food resources available to the insects. Flower colours were defined by their reflectance spectra, and the inherent colour preferences of the flies were determined by field experiments in which natural flowers were simulated using painted plastic discs. The results reveal that some hoverfly species are highly selective in their pollen diets, while others have a more generalist approach to their foraging. The division of flower resources by the more selective species is shown to be dependent, at least partially, on the colours of the flowers. The findings are discussed in relation to the theories of Competition and Optimal Foraging and the 'mechanistic approach' to ecology. The use of learning models is suggested as an alternative means of investigating patterns of resource use in future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flower colour; Mechanistic approach; Pollen; Resource partitioning; Syrphidae

Year:  1989        PMID: 28312171     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Visual pigment processes and prolonged pupillary responses in insect photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  D G Stavenga
Journal:  Biophys Struct Mech       Date:  1979

2.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fly photoreceptors. II. Spectral and polarized light sensitivity in the drone fly Eristalis.

Authors:  G A Horridge; K Mimura; Y Tsukahara
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1975-07-01

4.  Role of flower and pollen aromas in host-plant recognition by solitary bees.

Authors:  H E M Dobson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Foraging in male bumblebees (Bombus lucorum L.): maximizing energy or minimizing water load?

Authors:  Andreas Bertsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: apidae).

Authors:  Michael A Bowers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Learning to forage--optimally?

Authors:  J G Ollason
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 1.570

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Adult feeding by holometabolous insects: pollen and nectar as complementary nutrient sources for Rhingia campestris (Diptera: Syrphidae).

Authors:  John R Haslett
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Visual ecology of flies with particular reference to colour vision and colour preferences.

Authors:  Klaus Lunau
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Evolution of plant-pollinator mutualisms in response to climate change.

Authors:  R Tucker Gilman; Nicholas S Fabina; Karen C Abbott; Nicole E Rafferty
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Floral resource partitioning by individuals within generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Andrew Lucas; Owen Bodger; Berry J Brosi; Col R Ford; Dan W Forman; Carolyn Greig; Matthew Hegarty; Laura Jones; Penelope J Neyland; Natasha de Vere
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network.

Authors:  Jan Klecka; Jiří Hadrava; Paolo Biella; Asma Akter
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Generalisation and specialisation in hoverfly (Syrphidae) grassland pollen transport networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Andrew Lucas; Owen Bodger; Berry J Brosi; Col R Ford; Dan W Forman; Carolyn Greig; Matthew Hegarty; Penelope J Neyland; Natasha de Vere
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Structural field margin characteristics affect the functional traits of herbaceous vegetation.

Authors:  Cian Blaix; Anna-Camilla Moonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Companion Plants for Aphid Pest Management.

Authors:  Refka Ben-Issa; Laurent Gomez; Hélène Gautier
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.