Literature DB >> 28311333

The role of taste in food selection by freshwater zooplankton.

William R DeMott1.   

Abstract

Laboratory experiments with flavored and untreated polystyrene spheres revealed major differences in taste discrimination among diverse taxa of freshwater zooplankton. Copepods showed the strongest responses to flavor treatments. Both nauplii and copepodites of calanoid (Diaptomus) and cyclopoid (Cyclops) copepods selected flavored spheres over untreated ones. Moreover, a small cyclopoid, Tropocyclops, actively fed on an alga (Chlamydomonas) but did not ingest untreated spheres of the same size. Taste tests with cladocerans verified an overall tendency to ingest inert particles but also demonstrated important differences between families. Daphnids (4 species), Chydorus (Chydoridae) and Diaphanosoma (Sididae) did not respond to flavor treatments, while 2 species of bosminids selectively ingested flavored spheres. Daphnia also fed nonselectively in mixtures of algae and untreated spheres while Bosmina preferred algae over untreated spheres. Different species of rotifers exhibited 3 distinct responses to the flavor treatments: 1) Brachionus fed nonselectively, 2) Filinia fed preferentially on flavored 6 μm spheres, and 3) Polyarthra, Keratella, Synchaeta, and Noltholca infrequently ingested any spheres.Recent advances in our understanding of the feeding mechanisms of zooplankton help to explain why some taxa feed selectively on flavored particles while others do not. The ability of certain taxa to use taste to discriminate between high and low quality food particles has important implications for competition between zooplankton species and for interactions between planktonic grazers and their food resources.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 28311333     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Chemoreceptors and feeding in calanoid copepods (Arthropoda: Crustacea).

Authors:  M M Friedman; J R Strickler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Body size and food size in freshwater zooplankton.

Authors:  K G Bogdan; J J Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of surface chemistry in filter feeding by zooplankton.

Authors:  J Gerritsen; K G Porter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Chemosensory grazing by marine calanoid copepods (arthropoda: crustacea).

Authors:  S A Poulet; P Marsot
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Quantitative measurement of food selection : A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index.

Authors:  Jürgen Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Bacterial feeding by the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus: Clearance and ingestion rates, behavior and population dynamics.

Authors:  Peter L Starkweather; John J Gilbert; Thomas M Frost
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  28 in total

1.  Effects of stoichiometric dietary mixing on Daphnia growth and reproduction.

Authors:  Kumud Acharya; Marcia Kyle; James J Elser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Role of food partitioning in structuring the zooplankton community in mountain lakes.

Authors:  C Guisande; F Bartumeus; M Ventura; J Catalan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  β-cyclocitral, a grazer defence signal unique to the cyanobacterium Microcystis.

Authors:  Friedrich Jüttner; Susan B Watson; Eric von Elert; Oliver Köster
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Daphnia versus copepod impact on summer phytoplankton: functional compensation at both trophic levels.

Authors:  Ulrich Sommer; Frank Sommer; Barbara Santer; Eckart Zöllner; Klaus Jürgens; Colleen Jamieson; Maarten Boersma; Klaus Gocke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Grazing resistance in nutrient-stressed phytoplankton.

Authors:  Ellen van Donk; Dag O Hessen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Quantitative comparison of food niches in some freshwater zooplankton : A multi-tracer-cell approach.

Authors:  K G Bogdan; J J Gilbert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Implications of phytoplankton chemical composition for zooplankton production: experimental evidence.

Authors:  Alessandra Giani
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Discrimination by freshwater zooplankton between single algal cells differing in nutritional status.

Authors:  Nancy M Butler; Curtis A Suttle; William E Neill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Seasonal patterns of total and energy reserve lipids of dominant zooplanktonic crustaceans from a hyper-eutrophic lake.

Authors:  Michael T Arts; Marlene S Evans; Richard D Robarts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Filtering impacts of larval and sessile zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in western Lake Erie.

Authors:  Hugh J MacIsaac; Gary Sprules; Ora E Johannson; J H Leach
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.