Literature DB >> 28311126

Quantitative comparison of food niches in some freshwater zooplankton : A multi-tracer-cell approach.

K G Bogdan1, J J Gilbert1.   

Abstract

The abilities of some zooplankton (rotifers, cladocerans, copepods) to ingest different sizes and kinds of food cells were quantified by determining the relative efficiencies with which they ingested nine tracer-cell types, ranging from a coccoid bacterium (0.45 μm3) to the alga Cryptomonas erosa (800-920 μm3). These efficiencies were obtained by dividing the clearance rate of each zooplankton group (species population, developmental stage or size class of a species population) on each 32P-labeled cell type by that of a simultaneously-offered, 33P-labeled, standard cell type - Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Similarities of efficiency patterns on these cell types (food niches) between all possible pairs of the 17 zooplankton groups from 4 ecosystems were determined by calculating correlation coefficients. Although the utilization of the tested cell types may vary greatly within a species, three feeding guilds could be distinguished - based primarily on the efficiencies with which the smallest cell types were ingested. Guild I (Poyarthra vulgaris, Keratella crassa, Diaptomus minutus nauplii) ate the smallest cells (<4 μm diameter) (bacterium, Synechococcus, Nannochloris) and Ankistrodesmus very ineffifently but the three Cryptomonas species very efficiently. Guild II (Bosmina longirostris, D. minutus copepodites and Adults) had higher efficiencies on Synechococcus, Nannochloris, Ankistrodesmus, Stichococcus, and Stephanodiscus than guild I but similarly low ones on the bacterium and high ones on the Cryptomonas species. Guild III (Conochilus inicornis, Keratella cochlearis, Ceriodaphnia quadrangula, Diaphanosoma leuchtembergianum) differed from guilds I and II in having uniformly high efficiencies on all the small cells as well ad the larger ones. Principal component analysis of the matrix of correlation coefficients provided objective confirmation of the three guilds and provided a visual representation of the food niches of the 17 zooplankton groups in 3-dimensional space.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cladocerans; Copepods; Food niche; Rotifers

Year:  1987        PMID: 28311126     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  The postembryonic developmental instars of Diaptomus siciloides Lilljeborg.

Authors:  G W COMITA; D M TOMMERDAHL
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 1.804

2.  Body size and food size in freshwater zooplankton.

Authors:  K G Bogdan; J J Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of taste in food selection by freshwater zooplankton.

Authors:  William R DeMott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Bacterial feeding by the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus: Clearance and ingestion rates, behavior and population dynamics.

Authors:  Peter L Starkweather; John J Gilbert; Thomas M Frost
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Selective feeding of four zooplankton species on natural lake phytoplankton.

Authors:  Karin Knisely; Walter Geller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Implications of phytoplankton chemical composition for zooplankton production: experimental evidence.

Authors:  Alessandra Giani
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Impact of salinity on the grazing rate of a cladocera (Latonopsis australis) in a large tropical estuarine system.

Authors:  N Arunpandi; R Jyothibabu; L Jagadeesan; K J Albin; K M M Savitha; S Parthasarathi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Biogeography and co-occurrence of 16 planktonic species of Keratella Bory de St. Vincent, 1822 (Rotifera, Ploima, Brachionidae) in lakes and reservoirs of the United States.

Authors:  Claudia E Tausz; John R Beaver; Thomas R Renicker; Julia A Klepach; Amina I Pollard; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.091

4.  Role of rotifers in microzooplankton community in a large monsoonal estuary (Cochin backwaters) along the west coast of India.

Authors:  A Anjusha; R Jyothibabu; L Jagadeesan; N Arunpandi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.513

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.