Literature DB >> 16228259

Daphnia versus copepod impact on summer phytoplankton: functional compensation at both trophic levels.

Ulrich Sommer1, Frank Sommer, Barbara Santer, Eckart Zöllner, Klaus Jürgens, Colleen Jamieson, Maarten Boersma, Klaus Gocke.   

Abstract

Here we report on a mesocom study performed to compare the top-down impact of microphagous and macrophagous zooplankton on phytoplankton. We exposed a species-rich, summer phytoplankton assemblage from the mesotrophic Lake Schöhsee (Germany) to logarithmically scaled abundance gradients of the microphagous cladoceran Daphnia hyalinaxgaleata and of a macrophagous copepod assemblage. Total phytoplankton biomass, chlorophyll a and primary production showed only a weak or even insignificant response to zooplankton density in both gradients. In contrast to the weak responses of bulk parameters, both zooplankton groups exerted a strong and contrasting influence on the phytoplankton species composition. The copepods suppressed large phytoplankton, while nanoplanktonic algae increased with increasing copepod density. Daphnia suppressed small algae, while larger species compensated in terms of biomass for the losses. Autotrophic picoplankton declined with zooplankton density in both gradients. Gelatinous, colonial algae were fostered by both zooplankton functional groups, while medium-sized (ca. 3,000 microm3), non-gelatinous algae were suppressed by both. The impact of a functionally mixed zooplankton assemblage became evident when Daphnia began to invade and grow in copepod mesocosms after ca. 10 days. Contrary to the impact of a single functional group, the combined impact of both zooplankton groups led to a substantial decline in total phytoplankton biomass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 16228259     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1214-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  The diversity-stability debate.

Authors:  K S McCann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment.

Authors:  F D Hulot; G Lacroix; F Lescher-Moutoué; M Loreau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology.

Authors:  D F Doak; D Bigger; E K Harding; M A Marvier; R E O'Malley; D Thomson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis.

Authors:  S Yachi; M Loreau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of taste in food selection by freshwater zooplankton.

Authors:  William R DeMott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: Filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity.

Authors:  Walter Geller; Helga Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Enhancement of algal growth and productivity by grazing zooplankton.

Authors:  K G Porter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Ecotoxicological effects of rice field waters on selected planktonic species: comparison between conventional and organic farming.

Authors:  Andrea Suárez-Serrano; Carles Ibáñez; Silvia Lacorte; Carlos Barata
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Copepod and microzooplankton grazing in mesocosms fertilised with different Si:N ratios: no overlap between food spectra and Si:N influence on zooplankton trophic level.

Authors:  Ulrich Sommer; Thomas Hansen; Olga Blum; Nina Holzner; Olav Vadstein; Herwig Stibor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Cladocerans versus copepods: the cause of contrasting top-down controls on freshwater and marine phytoplankton.

Authors:  Ulrich Sommer; Frank Sommer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An indoor mesocosm system to study the effect of climate change on the late winter and spring succession of Baltic Sea phyto- and zooplankton.

Authors:  Ulrich Sommer; Nicole Aberle; Anja Engel; Thomas Hansen; Kathrin Lengfellner; Marcel Sandow; Julia Wohlers; Eckart Zöllner; Ulf Riebesell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Prey adaptation along a competition-defense tradeoff cryptically shifts trophic cascades from density- to trait-mediated.

Authors:  Zachary T Wood; David C Fryxell; Emma R Moffett; Michael T Kinnison; Kevin S Simon; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The impact of diel vertical migration of Daphnia on phytoplankton dynamics.

Authors:  Elke S Reichwaldt; Herwig Stibor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  An acute trophic cascade among microorganisms in the tree hole ecosystem following removal of omnivorous mosquito larvae.

Authors:  E D Walker; M G Kaufman; R W Merritt
Journal:  Community Ecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.185

8.  Grazing resistance and poor food quality of a widespread mixotroph impair zooplankton secondary production.

Authors:  Csaba F Vad; Claudia Schneider; Dunja Lukić; Zsófia Horváth; Martin J Kainz; Herwig Stibor; Robert Ptacnik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  The dilemma of controlling cultural eutrophication of lakes.

Authors:  David W Schindler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.