Literature DB >> 17736324

Chemosensory grazing by marine calanoid copepods (arthropoda: crustacea).

S A Poulet, P Marsot.   

Abstract

In laboratory experiments, mixed populations of two marine copepods (Acartia clausi and Eurytemora herdmani) when fed artificial food particles consisting of microcapsules that were either enriched with an encapsulated homogenate of naturally occurring phytoplankton or nonenriched preferentially ingested the enriched capsules. Beads or nonenriched capsules were either seldom ingested or not ingested at all. The observations demonstrate that filter-feeding in these species is a behavioral process, under sensory control, and that the copepods are able to discriminate between enriched and nonenriched food particles.

Year:  1978        PMID: 17736324     DOI: 10.1126/science.200.4348.1403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  10 in total

1.  β-cyclocitral, a grazer defence signal unique to the cyanobacterium Microcystis.

Authors:  Friedrich Jüttner; Susan B Watson; Eric von Elert; Oliver Köster
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  The role of taste in food selection by freshwater zooplankton.

Authors:  William R DeMott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Filtering structures and particle size selection in coexisting Cladocera.

Authors:  Dag Olav Hessen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Selective feeding of four zooplankton species on natural lake phytoplankton.

Authors:  Karin Knisely; Walter Geller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Morphology, flow regimes, and filtering rates of Daphnia, Ceriodaphnia, and Bosmina fed natural bacteria.

Authors:  Karen G Porter; Yvette S Feig; Elizabeth F Vetter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Feeding behavior of Daphnia pulex in crude oil dispersions.

Authors:  C K Wong; J R Strickler; F R Engelhardt
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Tumour-like anomaly of copepods-an evaluation of the possible causes in Indian marine waters.

Authors:  L Jagadeesan; R Jyothibabu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Quantifying Preferences and Responsiveness of Marine Zooplankton to Changing Environmental Conditions using Microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirupama Ramanathan; Oleg Simakov; Christoph A Merten; Detlev Arendt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Copepod foraging on the basis of food nutritional quality: can copepods really choose?

Authors:  Stamatina Isari; Meritxell Antό; Enric Saiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stream grazers determine their crawling direction on the basis of chemical and particulate microalgal cues.

Authors:  Izumi Katano; Hideyuki Doi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.