Literature DB >> 30859677

Liver fibrosis imaging: A clinical review of ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography.

Yingzhen N Zhang1, Kathryn J Fowler1, Arinc Ozturk2, Chetan K Potu1, Ashley L Louie1, Vivian Montes1, Walter C Henderson1, Kang Wang1, Michael P Andre3, Anthony E Samir2, Claude B Sirlin1.   

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a histological hallmark of most chronic liver diseases, which can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure, and predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma. Accurate diagnosis of liver fibrosis is necessary for prognosis, risk stratification, and treatment decision-making. Liver biopsy, the reference standard for assessing liver fibrosis, is invasive, costly, and impractical for surveillance and treatment response monitoring. Elastography offers a noninvasive, objective, and quantitative alternative to liver biopsy. This article discusses the need for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and reviews the comparative advantages and limitations of ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography techniques with respect to their basic concepts, acquisition, processing, and diagnostic performance. Variations in clinical contexts of use and common pitfalls associated with each technique are considered. In addition, current challenges and future directions to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of elastography techniques are discussed. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:25-42.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30859677      PMCID: PMC6742585          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  103 in total

Review 1.  Liver biopsy.

Authors:  A A Bravo; S G Sheth; S Chopra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Reducing the Number of Measurements in Liver Point Shear-Wave Elastography: Factors that Influence the Number and Reliability of Measurements in Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Cheng Fang; Ounali S Jaffer; Gibran T Yusuf; Eleni Konstantatou; Daniel J Quinlan; Kosh Agarwal; Alberto Quaglia; Paul S Sidhu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Kevin J Glaser; Anke Bergman; Rodrigo P Luz; Eduardo H de Figueiredo; Flavia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Assessment of liver fibrosis with 2-D shear wave elastography in comparison to transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Ludmila Gerber; Daniela Kasper; Daniel Fitting; Viola Knop; Annika Vermehren; Kathrin Sprinzl; Martin L Hansmann; Eva Herrmann; Joerg Bojunga; Joerg Albert; Christoph Sarrazin; Stefan Zeuzem; Mireen Friedrich-Rust
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Elastography methods for the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Davide Roccarina; Matteo Rosselli; Joan Genesca; Emmanuel A Tsochatzis
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Regression of fibrosis and portal hypertension in HCV-associated cirrhosis and sustained virologic response after interferon-free antiviral therapy.

Authors:  V Knop; D Hoppe; T Welzel; J Vermehren; E Herrmann; A Vermehren; M Friedrich-Rust; C Sarrazin; S Zeuzem; M-W Welker
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.728

8.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.

Authors:  Cara E Morin; Jonathan R Dillman; Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout; Jean A Tkach; Hui Wang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements.

Authors:  Giovanna Ferraioli; Carmine Tinelli; Raffaella Lissandrin; Mabel Zicchetti; Stefano Bernuzzi; Laura Salvaneschi; Carlo Filice
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  12 in total

1.  Normal Liver Stiffness Values in Children Are the Same as in Adults.

Authors:  Meng Yin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Jana G Delfino; Kalina V Jordanova; Megan E Poorman; Prathyush Chirra; Akshay S Chaudhari; Bettina Baessler; Jessica Winfield; Satish E Viswanath; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  Sesamol protects against liver fibrosis induced in rats by modulating lysophosphatidic acid receptor expression and TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Nesma A Abd Elrazik; Mohamed El-Mesery; Mamdouh M El-Shishtawy
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.195

4.  Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: the FNIH NIMBLE project.

Authors:  Arun J Sanyal; Sudha S Shankar; Roberto A Calle; Anthony E Samir; Claude B Sirlin; Sarah P Sherlock; Rohit Loomba; Kathryn J Fowler; Clayton A Dehn; Helen Heymann; Tania N Kamphaus
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 87.241

5.  Clinical utility of 3D magnetic resonance elastography in patients with biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Yujia Ma; Guoxin Wang; Feng Gao; Bing Ma; Qike Song; Shiling Zhong; Yuanyuan Liu; Yang Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Comparison of MR-PWI quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters for the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ke Ding; Manrong Liu; Xue Wei; Ruisui Huang; Jiong Chen; Shanjin Lu; Dacheng Wang; Wei Lu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  The impact of liver fibrosis on microvascular invasion and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with a solitary nodule: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis.

Authors:  En Lin; Baojia Zou; Guifang Zeng; Chaonong Cai; Peiping Li; Jiafan Chen; Decheng Li; Baimeng Zhang; Jian Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-08

Review 8.  Therapeutic and diagnostic targeting of fibrosis in metabolic, proliferative and viral disorders.

Authors:  Alexandros Marios Sofias; Federica De Lorenzi; Quim Peña; Armin Azadkhah Shalmani; Mihael Vucur; Jiong-Wei Wang; Fabian Kiessling; Yang Shi; Lorena Consolino; Gert Storm; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Hepatoprotective effect of Saccharomyces Cervisciae Cell Wall Extract against thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rats.

Authors:  Zeinab A El-Gendy; Salma A El-Marasy; Rania F Ahmed; Seham A El-Batran; Sahar S Abd El-Rahman; A Ramadan; S A H Youssef
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 10.  Noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis: review of current quantitative CT and MRI-based techniques.

Authors:  Won Hyeong Im; Ji Soo Song; Weon Jang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.