Literature DB >> 26162026

Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations.

Meng Yin1, Kevin J Glaser1, Jayant A Talwalkar1, Jun Chen1, Armando Manduca1, Richard L Ehman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the technical success rate and diagnostic performance of liver magnetic resonance (MR) elastography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with patient informed consent. A total of 1377 consecutive MR elastography examinations performed between 2007 and 2010 in 1287 patients for clinical indications were included. Medical records were used to retrieve liver stiffness as assessed with MR elastography, histologic analysis, blood work, and other liver disease-related information. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and analysis of covariance methods were used to evaluate the diagnostic values and relationships of the collected data.
RESULTS: Hepatic MR elastography had a success rate of 94.4% (1300 of 1377 cases) and yielded reproducible measurements (r = 0.9716, P < .0001) in the study cohort, with a complex patient profile and multiple interpreters. Body mass index had no significant effect on success rate (P = .2). In 289 patients who underwent liver biopsy within 1 year of the MR elastography date, mean liver stiffness as assessed with MR elastography was significantly higher in patients with advanced fibrosis (stages F3, F4) than in those with mild to moderate fibrosis (stages F0, F1, F2) (5.93 kPa ± 2.31 [standard deviation] vs 3.35 kPa ± 1.44, P < .0001). Liver stiffness is associated with many factors other than fibrosis extent, including cause of fibrosis (viral hepatitis C vs nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, P = .025), inflammation (severe vs mild to moderate, P = .03), and hepatic metabolic and synthetic function (no fibrosis vs intermediate fibrosis, P ≤ .01).
CONCLUSION: In a general clinical practice environment, hepatic MR elastography is a robust imaging method with a high success rate in a broad spectrum of patients. It also shows the complex association between liver stiffness and hepatic pathophysiology. © RSNA, 2015 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26162026      PMCID: PMC4688072          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  66 in total

1.  Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography.

Authors:  Laurent Sandrin; Mickaël Tanter; Stefan Catheline; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Cross-validation of MR elastography and ultrasound transient elastography in liver stiffness measurement: discrepancy in the results of cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Fumitake Amemiya; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Ali Muhi; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Test-retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C.

Authors:  Norah J Shire; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Radha A Railkar; Sabrina Fox-Bosetti; Stephanie M Johnson; Chan R Beals; Bernard J Dardzinski; Schuyler O Sanderson; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Estimation of the absolute shear stiffness of human lung parenchyma using (1) H spin echo, echo planar MR elastography.

Authors:  Yogesh K Mariappan; Kevin J Glaser; David L Levin; Robert Vassallo; Rolf D Hubmayr; Carl Mottram; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Clinical evidence for the regression of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ellis; Derek A Mann
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging and transient elastography for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis in NAFLD.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Daniela Romen; Johannes Vermehren; Susanne Kriener; Dilek Sadet; Eva Herrmann; Stefan Zeuzem; Joerg Bojunga
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Mechanical stretch induces matrix metalloproteinase 1 production in human hepatic stellate cells.

Authors:  Takashi Goto; Ken-Ichiro Mikami; Kouich Miura; Shigetoshi Ohshima; Kazuo Yoneyama; Kunio Nakane; Daisuke Watanabe; Michiro Otaka; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2004-12

8.  Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Nathalie Ganne-Carrié; Marianne Ziol; Victor de Ledinghen; Catherine Douvin; Patrick Marcellin; Laurent Castera; Daniel Dhumeaux; Jean-Claude Trinchet; Michel Beaugrand
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Cross-validation of magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound-based transient elastography: a preliminary phantom study.

Authors:  Jennifer Oudry; Jun Chen; Kevin J Glaser; Véronique Miette; Laurent Sandrin; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  82 in total

1.  Progress in non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Chengxi Li; Rentao Li; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.248

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Paul Manning; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Florin Vaida; Meng Yin; Kevin Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  Pre-clinical MR elastography: Principles, techniques, and applications.

Authors:  P V Bayly; J R Garbow
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  Imaging Modalities in Pediatric NAFLD.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Jennifer Panganiban; Manish Dhyani; Andrew J Degnan; Sudha A Anupindi
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

5.  Multiparametric CT for Noninvasive Staging of Hepatitis C Virus-Related Liver Fibrosis: Correlation With the Histopathologic Fibrosis Score.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Adnan Said; Daniel Jones; Brandon Welsh; Ryan Zea; Meghan G Lubner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diagnostic performance of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for predicting portal hypertension in children and young adults with autoimmune liver disease.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout; Ruchi Singh; Jean A Tkach; Amy E Taylor; Burns C Blaxall; Lin Fei; Alexander G Miethke
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03

Review 7.  Putting it all together: established and emerging MRI techniques for detecting and measuring liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout; Alexander Miethke; Eric Diaz; Stavra A Xanthakos; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

8.  Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants.

Authors:  Cynthia Hsu; Cyrielle Caussy; Kento Imajo; Jun Chen; Siddharth Singh; Kellee Kaulback; Minh-Da Le; Jonathan Hooker; Xin Tu; Ricki Bettencourt; Meng Yin; Claude B Sirlin; Richard L Ehman; Atsushi Nakajima; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 10.  [Functional MR imaging of the liver].

Authors:  A Wibmer; R Nolz; M Trauner; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.