| Literature DB >> 28240235 |
Mareike Töpperwien1,2, Martin Krenkel1, Daniel Vincenz3, Franziska Stöber3, Anja M Oelschlegel3, Jürgen Goldschmidt3, Tim Salditt1,2.
Abstract
Studies of brain cytoarchitecture in mammals are routinely performed by serial sectioning of the specimen and staining of the sections. The procedure is labor-intensive and the 3D architecture can only be determined after aligning individual 2D sections, leading to a reconstructed volume with non-isotropic resolution. Propagation-based x-ray phase-contrast tomography offers a unique potential for high-resolution 3D imaging of intact biological specimen due to the high penetration depth and potential resolution. We here show that even compact laboratory CT at an optimized liquid-metal jet microfocus source combined with suitable phase-retrieval algorithms and a novel tissue preparation can provide cellular and subcellular resolution in millimeter sized samples of mouse brain. We removed water and lipids from entire mouse brains and measured the remaining dry tissue matrix in air, lowering absorption but increasing phase contrast. We present single-cell resolution images of mouse brain cytoarchitecture and show that axons can be revealed in myelinated fiber bundles. In contrast to optical 3D techniques our approach does neither require staining of cells nor tissue clearing, procedures that are increasingly difficult to apply with increasing sample and brain sizes. The approach thus opens a novel route for high-resolution high-throughput studies of brain architecture in mammals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28240235 PMCID: PMC5327439 DOI: 10.1038/srep42847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Laboratory setup (a) Schematic of the setup, in which X-rays are generated by a liquid-metal jet microfocus source. Depending on the ratio between the source-to-object and object-to-detector distances, it is either implemented in a cone-beam geometry or an inverse geometry imaging mode. (b) Image of an absorbing test pattern with 800 nm lines and spaces, together with the corresponding line profile along the structure (width: 50 px). (c) Close-up of a detached (mouse) cerebellar vermis and mounting of the sample in a pipette tip. (d) Typical empty-beam corrected projection of the sample in inverse geometry, with a line profile (width: 5 px) along an edge to illustrate the edge-enhancement effect. For a better signal-to-noise ratio, the projection has been resampled by a factor 2. (e) Reconstruction of the intensity distribution using the BAC algorithm. The line profile shows the advantage of the phase retrieval as the edge-enhancement is removed while simultaneously the signal-to-noise ratio increases. Scalebars: (c) 1 mm and (d,e) 250 μm.
Figure 2Combination of cone-beam and inverse geometry imaging modes (a) Volume rendering of the right hemisphere of a mouse brain, recorded in cone-beam geometry. The grey planes indicate the position of the slices shown in (b,c). (b,c) Coronal/Horizontal slice through the reconstructed volume. (d) Reconstructed coronal slice from the hippocampal region at cellular resolution, recorded in inverse geometry. The position of the high-resolution measurement in relation to the total sample volume is indicated in (b). Prior to the tomographic reconstruction the individual projections were resampled by a factor 2. (e) Maximum intensity projection of 31 successive slices, imitating a 30 μm thick histological section. (f) Reconstructed horizontal slice from the cortical region. (g) Maximum intensity projection of 31 slices. Prominent cortical features as the barrel field are clearly visible. Scalebars: (b,c) 500 μm, (d–g) 200 μm.
Figure 3Volume rendering down to the cellular level of a mouse cerebellar vermis (a) Transverse slice through the reconstructed volume, showing the molecular layer (ML), granular layer (GL), white matter (WM) and Purkinje cell layer (PCL) of the cerebellar vermis at cellular resolution. Prior to the tomographic reconstruction the individual projections were resampled by a factor 2. (b) A longitudinal slice through the volume shows sufficient contrast to identify axon bundles within the white matter. (c) Automatic volume rendering of the sample with a cut within the volume, indicating the position of the cellular segmentation shown in (d). (d) Cellular segmentation of a small part of the sample. Scalebars: 200 μm.