Literature DB >> 17368579

Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: an event-related potential study.

Edith Kaan1, Ratree Wayland, Mingzhen Bao, Christopher M Barkley.   

Abstract

Tone languages such as Thai use pitch differences to distinguish lexical meaning. Previous behavioral studies have reported that naïve listeners can discriminate among lexical tones, but that native language background affects performance. The present study uses ERPs to determine whether native speakers of a tone language (Mandarin Chinese) and of a non-tone language (English) differ in their pre-attentive discrimination among Thai lexical tones, and whether training has a different effect in these two language groups. EEGs were obtained from 10 native Mandarin Chinese speakers, 10 English and 10 Thai speakers in an oddball paradigm: The Thai syllable [k(h)a:] pronounced with a high rising or low falling tone, was presented as an infrequent deviant amidst a standard mid level tone [k(h)a:] syllable, while participants watched a silent movie. Next, the Chinese and English participants completed a 2-day perceptual identification training on the mid level and low falling tones, and returned for a post training EEG. The low falling tone deviant elicited a Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in all participant groups before and after training; the high rising deviant elicited no, or a smaller, MMN, which became larger after training only in the English group. The high rising deviant also elicited a later negativity (350-650 ms) versus the mid level standard, which decreased after training in the Chinese group. These results suggest that non-Thai speakers can pre-attentively discriminate among Thai tones, but are sensitive to different physical properties of the tones, depending on their native language. English speakers are more sensitive to early pitch differences, whereas native speakers of Mandarin Chinese are more sensitive to the (later) pitch contour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368579     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  14 in total

1.  Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Padma D Sampath; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reading acquisition reorganizes the phonological awareness network only in alphabetic writing systems.

Authors:  Christine Brennan; Fan Cao; Nicole Pedroarena-Leal; Chris McNorgan; James R Booth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  Communication disorders in speakers of tone languages: etiological bases and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Tyler K Perrachione; Geshri Gunasekera; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.761

Review 5.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Native experience with a tone language enhances pitch discrimination and the timing of neural responses to pitch change.

Authors:  Ryan J Giuliano; Peter Q Pfordresher; Emily M Stanley; Shalini Narayana; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-03

7.  Individual aptitude in Mandarin lexical tone perception predicts effectiveness of high-variability training.

Authors:  Makiko Sadakata; James M McQueen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-25

8.  Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: an event-related potentials training study.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Christopher M Barkley; Mingzhen Bao; Ratree Wayland
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Temporal relation between top-down and bottom-up processing in lexical tone perception.

Authors:  Lan Shuai; Tao Gong
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Changes in oscillatory brain networks after lexical tone training.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Ratree Wayland; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2013-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.