Literature DB >> 28223186

Reduction of across-run variability of temporal SNR in accelerated EPI time-series data through FLEET-based robust autocalibration.

Anna I Blazejewska1, Himanshu Bhat2, Lawrence L Wald3, Jonathan R Polimeni3.   

Abstract

Temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) is a key metric for assessing the ability to detect brain activation in fMRI data. A recent study has shown substantial variation of tSNR between multiple runs of accelerated EPI acquisitions reconstructed with the GRAPPA method using protocols commonly used for fMRI experiments. Across-run changes in the location of high-tSNR regions could lead to misinterpretation of the observed brain activation patterns, reduced sensitivity of the fMRI studies, and biased results. We compared conventional EPI autocalibration (ACS) methods with the recently-introduced FLEET ACS method, measuring their tSNR variability, as well as spatial overlap and displacement of high-tSNR clusters across runs in datasets acquired from human subjects at 7T and 3T. FLEET ACS reconstructed data had higher tSNR levels, as previously reported, as well as better temporal consistency and larger overlap of the high-tSNR clusters across runs compared with reconstructions using conventional multi-shot (ms) EPI ACS data. tSNR variability across two different runs of the same protocol using ms-EPI ACS data was about two times larger than for the protocol using FLEET ACS for acceleration factors (R) 2 and 3, and one and half times larger for R=4. The level of across-run tSNR consistency for data reconstructed with FLEET ACS was similar to within-run tSNR consistency. The displacement of high-tSNR clusters across two runs (inter-cluster distance) decreased from ∼8mm in the time-series reconstructed using conventional ms-EPI ACS data to ∼4mm for images reconstructed using FLEET ACS. However, the performance gap between conventional ms-EPI ACS and FLEET ACS narrowed with increasing parallel imaging acceleration factor. Overall, the FLEET ACS method provides a simple solution to the problem of varying tSNR across runs, and therefore helps ensure that an assumption of fMRI analysis-that tSNR is largely consistent across runs-is met for accelerated acquisitions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7T MRI; EPI autocalibration signal; FLEET; GRAPPA; High-resolution fMRI; Respiratory artifacts; Temporal SNR; UHF fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28223186      PMCID: PMC5432429          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  32 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. 1986.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; D Matthaei; W Hänicke; K-D Merboldt
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Variation of noise in multi-run functional MRI using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Hu Cheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters.

Authors:  C Triantafyllou; R D Hoge; G Krueger; C J Wiggins; A Potthast; G C Wiggins; L L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  How long to scan? The relationship between fMRI temporal signal to noise ratio and necessary scan duration.

Authors:  Kevin Murphy; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Autocalibrated coil sensitivity estimation for parallel imaging.

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Felix Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Stephan Kannengiesser; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias Mueller; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Berthold Kiefer; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Interleaved snapshot echo planar imaging of mouse brain at 7.0 T.

Authors:  David N Guilfoyle; Jan Hrabe
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Reducing sensitivity losses due to respiration and motion in accelerated echo planar imaging by reordering the autocalibration data acquisition.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Himanshu Bhat; Thomas Witzel; Thomas Benner; Thorsten Feiweier; Souheil J Inati; Ville Renvall; Keith Heberlein; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Improvement of temporal signal-to-noise ratio of GRAPPA accelerated echo planar imaging using a FLASH based calibration scan.

Authors:  S Lalith Talagala; Joelle E Sarlls; Siyuan Liu; Souheil J Inati
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variable slice thickness (VAST) EPI for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in whole-brain GE-EPI at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Sascha Brunheim; Sören Johst; Viktor Pfaffenrot; Stefan Maderwald; Harald H Quick; Benedikt A Poser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Intracortical smoothing of small-voxel fMRI data can provide increased detection power without spatial resolution losses compared to conventional large-voxel fMRI data.

Authors:  Anna I Blazejewska; Bruce Fischl; Lawrence L Wald; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  High-resolution fMRI at 7 Tesla: challenges, promises and recent developments for individual-focused fMRI studies.

Authors:  Olivia Viessmann; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.