Literature DB >> 15862224

Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters.

C Triantafyllou1, R D Hoge, G Krueger, C J Wiggins, A Potthast, G C Wiggins, L L Wald.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that under some conditions, noise fluctuations in an fMRI time-course are dominated by physiological modulations of the image intensity with secondary contributions from thermal image noise and that these two sources scale differently with signal intensity, susceptibility weighting (TE) and field strength. The SNR of the fMRI time-course was found to be near its asymptotic limit for moderate spatial resolution measurements at 3 T with only marginal gains expected from acquisition at higher field strengths. In this study, we investigate the amplitude of image intensity fluctuations in the fMRI time-course at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T as a function of image resolution, flip angle and TE. The time-course SNR was a similar function of the image SNR regardless of whether the image SNR was modulated by flip angle, image resolution, or field strength. For spatial resolutions typical of those currently used in fMRI (e.g., 3 x 3 x 3 mm(3)), increases in image SNR obtained from 7 T acquisition produced only modest increases in time-course SNR. At this spatial resolution, the ratio of physiological noise to thermal image noise was 0.61, 0.89, and 2.23 for 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T. At a resolution of 1 x 1 x 3 mm(3), however, the physiological to thermal noise ratio was 0.34, 0.57, and 0.91 for 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T for TE near T2*. Thus, by reducing the signal strength using higher image resolution, the ratio of physiologic to image noise could be reduced to a regime where increased sensitivity afforded by higher field strength still translated to improved SNR in the fMRI time-series.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15862224     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  237 in total

1.  Distinct neural substrates for semantic knowledge and naming in the temporoparietal network.

Authors:  Benno Gesierich; Jorge Jovicich; Marianna Riello; Michela Adriani; Alessia Monti; Valentina Brentari; Simon D Robinson; Stephen M Wilson; Scott L Fairhall; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Influence of dense-array EEG cap on fMRI signal.

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Single-shot echo-planar imaging with Nyquist ghost compensation: interleaved dual echo with acceleration (IDEA) echo-planar imaging (EPI).

Authors:  Benedikt A Poser; Markus Barth; Pål-Erik Goa; Weiran Deng; V Andrew Stenger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Comparison of functional connectivity in default mode and sensorimotor networks at 3 and 7T.

Authors:  Joanne R Hale; Matthew J Brookes; Emma L Hall; Johanna M Zumer; Claire M Stevenson; Susan T Francis; Peter G Morris
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance: Why and when?

Authors:  Ewald Moser
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

6.  Physiological noise effects on the flip angle selection in BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  J Gonzalez-Castillo; V Roopchansingh; P A Bandettini; J Bodurka
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Three-dimensional acquisition of cerebral blood volume and flow responses during functional stimulation in a single scan.

Authors:  Ying Cheng; Peter C M van Zijl; James J Pekar; Jun Hua
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A kernel machine-based fMRI physiological noise removal method.

Authors:  Xiaomu Song; Nan-kuei Chen; Pooja Gaur
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.