Literature DB >> 30690157

Intracortical smoothing of small-voxel fMRI data can provide increased detection power without spatial resolution losses compared to conventional large-voxel fMRI data.

Anna I Blazejewska1, Bruce Fischl2, Lawrence L Wald3, Jonathan R Polimeni3.   

Abstract

Continued improvement in MRI acquisition technology has made functional MRI (fMRI) with small isotropic voxel sizes down to 1 mm and below more commonly available. Although many conventional fMRI studies seek to investigate regional patterns of cortical activation for which conventional voxel sizes of 3 mm and larger provide sufficient spatial resolution, smaller voxels can help avoid contamination from adjacent white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and thereby increase the specificity of fMRI to signal changes within the gray matter. Unfortunately, temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR), a metric of fMRI sensitivity, is reduced in high-resolution acquisitions, which offsets the benefits of small voxels. Here we introduce a framework that combines small, isotropic fMRI voxels acquired at 7 T field strength with a novel anatomically-informed, surface mesh-navigated spatial smoothing that can provide both higher detection power and higher resolution than conventional voxel sizes. Our smoothing approach uses a family of intracortical surface meshes and allows for kernels of various shapes and sizes, including curved 3D kernels that adapt to and track the cortical folding pattern. Our goal is to restrict smoothing to the cortical gray matter ribbon and avoid noise contamination from CSF and signal dilution from WM via partial volume effects. We found that the intracortical kernel that maximizes tSNR does not maximize percent signal change (ΔS/S), and therefore the kernel configuration that optimizes detection power cannot be determined from tSNR considerations alone. However, several kernel configurations provided a favorable balance between boosting tSNR and ΔS/S, and allowed a 1.1-mm isotropic fMRI acquisition to have higher performance after smoothing (in terms of both detection power and spatial resolution) compared to an unsmoothed 3.0-mm isotropic fMRI acquisition. Overall, the results of this study support the strategy of acquiring voxels smaller than the cortical thickness, even for studies not requiring high spatial resolution, and smoothing them down within the cortical ribbon with a kernel of an appropriate shape to achieve the best performance-thus decoupling the choice of fMRI voxel size from the spatial resolution requirements of the particular study. The improvement of this new intracortical smoothing approach over conventional surface-based smoothing is expected to be modest for conventional resolutions, however the improvement is expected to increase with higher resolutions. This framework can also be applied to anatomically-informed intracortical smoothing of higher-resolution data (e.g. along columns and layers) in studies with prior information about the spatial structure of activation.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Columnar fMRI; Cortical depth analysis; High-resolution fMRI; Laminar fMRI; Physiological noise; Spatial smoothing; Surface-based analysis; fMRI analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30690157      PMCID: PMC6668026          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  50 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Anatomically informed basis functions.

Authors:  S J Kiebel; R Goebel; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data.

Authors:  M W Woolrich; B D Ripley; M Brady; S M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Physiological noise in oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Detection of fMRI activation using cortical surface mapping.

Authors:  A Andrade; F Kherif; J F Mangin; K J Worsley; A L Paradis; O Simon; S Dehaene; D Le Bihan; J B Poline
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters.

Authors:  C Triantafyllou; R D Hoge; G Krueger; C J Wiggins; A Potthast; G C Wiggins; L L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Effect of spatial smoothing on physiological noise in high-resolution fMRI.

Authors:  Christina Triantafyllou; Richard D Hoge; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Divide and conquer: a defense of functional localizers.

Authors:  Rebecca Saxe; Matthew Brett; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Martin I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Cortical thickness analysis in autism with heat kernel smoothing.

Authors:  Moo K Chung; Steven M Robbins; Kim M Dalton; Richard J Davidson; Andrew L Alexander; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of BOLD and CBV using 3D EPI and 3D GRASE for cortical layer functional MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Alexander J S Beckett; Tetiana Dadakova; Jennifer Townsend; Laurentius Huber; Suhyung Park; David A Feinberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Cortical Surface-Informed Volumetric Spatial Smoothing of fMRI Data via Graph Signal Processing.

Authors:  Hamid Behjat; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Iman Aganj
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2021-11

3.  Investigating mechanisms of fast BOLD responses: The effects of stimulus intensity and of spatial heterogeneity of hemodynamics.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Gary H Glover; Nina E Fultz; Bruce R Rosen; Jonathan R Polimeni; Laura D Lewis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 4.  New acquisition techniques and their prospects for the achievable resolution of fMRI.

Authors:  Saskia Bollmann; Markus Barth
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Ultra-high spatial resolution BOLD fMRI in humans using combined segmented-accelerated VFA-FLEET with a recursive RF pulse design.

Authors:  Avery J L Berman; William A Grissom; Thomas Witzel; Shahin Nasr; Daniel J Park; Kawin Setsompop; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  High-resolution fMRI at 7 Tesla: challenges, promises and recent developments for individual-focused fMRI studies.

Authors:  Olivia Viessmann; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-17

7.  Critical factors in achieving fine-scale functional MRI: Removing sources of inadvertent spatial smoothing.

Authors:  Jianbao Wang; Shahin Nasr; Anna Wang Roe; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.399

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.