| Literature DB >> 28196494 |
Rutger H Stoffers1,2, Marie Madden1, Mohammed Shahid1, Francisco Contijoch2, Joseph Solomon1, James J Pilla1, Joseph H Gorman2, Robert C Gorman2, Walter R T Witschey3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evolution of T1ρ and of other endogenous contrast methods (T2, T1) in the first month after reperfused myocardial infarction (MI) is uncertain. We conducted a study of reperfused MI in pigs to serially monitor T1ρ, T2 and T1 relaxation, scar size and transmurality at 1 and 4 weeks post-MI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28196494 PMCID: PMC5310026 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0332-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Experimental design. N = 10 animals underwent ischemia reperfusion and all animals had a 1 week CMR. Histology was performed in five animals immediately after 1 week CMR and 4 week CMR was performed in the other five animals
Hemodynamics at baseline and post-infarction, mean ± standard deviation
| Baseline ( | 1 Week ( | 4 Week ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEDV, mL | 70.3 ± 8.7 | 85.2 ± 13.7 | 94.5 ± 11.9* |
| LVESV, mL | 29.5 ± 6.8 | 45.5 ± 12.9 | 52.2 ± 10.3** |
| LVEF, % | 58.4 ± 5.7 | 48.5 ± 6.8 | 45.0 ± 5.9* |
| CO, mL/min | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.6 |
| LV mass, g | 57.7 ± 8.1 | 66.6 ± 8.6 | 65.1 ± 9.9 |
| WTa, mm | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.6 | 4.8 ± 0.5* |
aWT reported for mid-LV slice with visible scar on LGE
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 (paired t-test, 4 week different from 1 week)
Fig. 2T1R, T2, T1 and LGE at 1 and 4 weeks in the same animal. The arrows in the LGE images indicate the hyperintense infarct region. Full LV coverage is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1
Fig. 3Relaxation times and contrast-to-noise ratio at 1 and 4 weeks after ischemia and reperfusion. a Relaxation times for T1ρ and T2 in healthy remote myocardium and infarcted myocardium and b Native T1 relaxation times in healthy remote myocardium and infarcted myocardium. c contrast-to-noise ratio of T1ρ, T2 and T1. * indicates p < 0.05 and ** indicates s < 0.01
Infarct size and transmurality, mean ± standard deviation
| T1ρ | LGE | T2 | T1 | Ex vivo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | |||||
| Infarct Size, % | 12.4 ± 2.7 | 11.8 ± 2.6 | 9.9 ± 2.8 | 14.0 ± 5.3 | 8.8 ± 2.3 |
| Transmurality, % | 50.3 ± 16.8 | 42.6 ± 19.9 | 31.1 ± 15.2 | 48.6 ± 26.6 | N/A |
| 4 Week | |||||
| Infarct Size, % | 8.6 ± 2.3* | 9.0 ± 2.9* | 9.8 ± 2.5 | 10.5 ± 2.3* | 10.1 ± 4.0 |
| Transmuralitya, % | 32.8 ± 18.8 | 45.5 ± 17,8 | 47.8 ± 15.5 | 33.1 ± 22.6 | N/A |
aTransmurality reported for infero- and anterolateral myocardial segments (two segments of six total) for segments with transmurality > 5%
*p < 0.05 (paired t-test, 4 week different from 1 week). Transmurality not reported ex vivo.
Fig. 4Infarct size correlation and Bland-Altman graphs for T1ρ, T2 and T1 in comparison to LGE. There was excellent correlation between T1ρ and LGE scar size, good correlation between T1 and LGE, and poor correlation between T2 and LGE.
Fig. 5In vivo CMR and histology from two pigs at 1 and 4 weeks post-infarction. TTC staining shows an infarct with a hemorrhage core at the anteroseptal myocardium at 1 week post-MI. In the fibrotic regions, there was intermixed granulation tissue, dense fibrosis and myocardium and mature scar at 4 weeks. There was no difference in infarct size at 1 or 4 weeks compared to histology. 1. Hemorrhage core and intermixed granulation tissue; 2. Infarcted myocardium; dense fibrosis; 3. Remote myocardium.
Fig. 6Infarct transmurality correlation and Bland-Altman graphs for T1ρ, T2 and T1 in comparison to LGE. There was excellent correlation between T1ρ and LGE scar transmurality.