Literature DB >> 28154496

Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Jianhong Shen1, Thomas J Palmeri1.   

Abstract

Recent years has seen growing interest in understanding, characterizing, and explaining individual differences in visual cognition. We focus here on individual differences in visual categorization. Categorization is the fundamental visual ability to group different objects together as the same kind of thing. Research on visual categorization and category learning has been significantly informed by computational modeling, so our review will focus both on how formal models of visual categorization have captured individual differences and how individual difference have informed the development of formal models. We first examine the potential sources of individual differences in leading models of visual categorization, providing a brief review of a range of different models. We then describe several examples of how computational models have captured individual differences in visual categorization. This review also provides a bit of an historical perspective, starting with models that predicted no individual differences, to those that captured group differences, to those that predict true individual differences, and to more recent hierarchical approaches that can simultaneously capture both group and individual differences in visual categorization. Via this selective review, we see how considerations of individual differences can lead to important theoretical insights into how people visually categorize objects in the world around them. We also consider new directions for work examining individual differences in visual categorization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational modeling; individual difference; visual categorization

Year:  2016        PMID: 28154496      PMCID: PMC5278636          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1236053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  95 in total

Review 1.  Models of object recognition.

Authors:  M Riesenhuber; T Poggio
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; M Styvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-03

3.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization.

Authors:  K Lamberts
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Thirty categorization results in search of a model.

Authors:  J D Smith; J P Minda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Exemplar representation without generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda's (2000) "Thirty categorization results in search of a model".

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning.

Authors:  J Feldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A hybrid model of categorization.

Authors:  J R Anderson; J Betz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

9.  Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

10.  Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.

Authors:  T J Palmeri; R M Nosofsky
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-02
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Craig A Sanders; Xiaojin Zhu; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review.

Authors:  Michel Wedel; Rik Pieters; Ralf van der Lans
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 3.  Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.