Literature DB >> 11127838

Models of object recognition.

M Riesenhuber1, T Poggio.   

Abstract

Understanding how biological visual systems recognize objects is one of the ultimate goals in computational neuroscience. From the computational viewpoint of learning, different recognition tasks, such as categorization and identification, are similar, representing different trade-offs between specificity and invariance. Thus, the different tasks do not require different classes of models. We briefly review some recent trends in computational vision and then focus on feedforward, view-based models that are supported by psychophysical and physiological data.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127838     DOI: 10.1038/81479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  144 in total

1.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Continuous transformation learning of translation invariant representations.

Authors:  G Perry; E T Rolls; S M Stringer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The selectivity of neurons in the macaque fundus of the superior temporal area for three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  Santosh G Mysore; Rufin Vogels; Steven E Raiguel; James T Todd; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Kohei Nonose; Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-21

7.  Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; James W Tanaka; Sophie Lebrecht; Michael J Tarr; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-08

Review 8.  The role of the feedforward paradigm in cognitive psychology.

Authors:  Demis Basso; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-04-28

9.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity.

Authors:  Xiong Jiang; Evan Bradley; Regina A Rini; Thomas Zeffiro; John Vanmeter; Maximilian Riesenhuber
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.