Literature DB >> 11848582

A hybrid model of categorization.

J R Anderson1, J Betz.   

Abstract

Category learning is often modeled as either an exemplar-based or a rule-based process. This paper shows that both strategies can be combined in a cognitive architecture that was developed to model other task domains. Variations on the exemplar-based random walk (EBRW) model of Nosofsky and Palmeri (1997b) and the rule-plus-exception (RULEX) rule-based model of Nosofsky, Palmeri, and McKinley (1994) were implemented in the ACT-R cognitive architecture. The architecture allows the two strategies to be mixed to produce classification behavior. The combined system reproduces latency, learning, and generalization data from three category-learning experiments--Nosofsky and Palmeri (1997b), Nosofsky et al., and Erickson and Kruschke (1998). It is concluded that EBRW and ACT-R have different but equivalent means of incorporating similarity and practice. In addition, ACT-R brings a theory of strategy selection that enables the exemplar and the rule-based strategies to be mixed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11848582     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Practice and retention: a unifying analysis.

Authors:  J R Anderson; J M Fincham; S Douglass
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; L A Alfonso-Reese
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; M K Johansen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice.

Authors:  A Heathcote; S Brown; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

5.  On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication.

Authors:  J I Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill.

Authors:  R S Siegler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-09
View more
  21 in total

1.  As easy to memorize as they are to classify: the 5-4 categories and the category advantage.

Authors:  Mark Blair; Don Homa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

2.  An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning.

Authors:  Magda Osman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

3.  The role of visuospatial and verbal working memory in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Dagmar Zeithamova; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  Executive attention and task switching in category learning: evidence for stimulus-dependent representation.

Authors:  Michael A Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

5.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

6.  Acquiring experiential traces in word-referent learning.

Authors:  Tobias Richter; Rolf A Zwaan; Inga Hoever
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

7.  A rule-based presentation order facilitates category learning.

Authors:  Fabien Mathy; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

8.  What it costs to implement a plan: plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

9.  Similar to the category, but not the exemplars: A study of generalization.

Authors:  Nolan Conaway; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

10.  Individual differences in category learning: memorization versus rule abstraction.

Authors:  Jeri L Little; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.