Literature DB >> 11293456

The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning.

R L Goldstone1, M Styvers.   

Abstract

The reported experiments explored 2 mechanisms by which object descriptions are flexibly adapted to support concept learning: selective attention and dimension differentiation. Arbitrary dimensions were created by blending photographs of faces in different proportions. Consistent with learned selective attention, positive transfer was found when initial and final categorizations shared either relevant or irrelevant dimensions. Unexpectedly good transfer was observed when both irrelevant dimensions became relevant and relevant dimensions became irrelevant, and was explained in terms of participants learning to isolate one dimension from another. This account was further supported by experiments indicating that conditions expected to produce positive transfer via dimension differentiation produced better transfer than conditions expected to produce positive transfer via selective attention, but only when stimuli were composed of highly integral and spatially overlapping dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11293456     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  34 in total

1.  Value is in the eye of the beholder: early visual cortex codes monetary value of objects during a diverted attention task.

Authors:  Andrew S Persichetti; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Mark Steyvers; Brian J Rogosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

Review 3.  A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning.

Authors:  Bob Rehder; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Category learning increases discriminability of relevant object dimensions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Formation of category representations.

Authors:  A J Wills; Malia Noury; Nicholas J Moberly; Matthew Newport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

7.  Asymmetries in categorization, perceptual discrimination, and visual search for reference and nonreference exemplars.

Authors:  Olivier Corneille; Robert L Goldstone; Sarah Queller; Timothy Potter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

8.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 9.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Category label and response location shifts in category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Brian D Glass; Jeffrey B O'Brien; J Vincent Filoteo; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.