Literature DB >> 12817754

Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.

H H Bolotin1, H Sievänen, J L Grashuis.   

Abstract

Nonuniform extraosseous fat is shown to raise the magnitude of inaccuracies in DXA in vivo BMD measurements into the range of 20-50% in clinically relevant cases. Hence, DXA-based bone fragility diagnoses/ prognoses and evaluations of bone responsiveness to treatment can be unreliable. Patient-specific DXA in vivo bone mineral areal density (BMD) measurements have been demonstrated to be inherently inaccurate even when extraosseous fat (F) and lean muscle tissue (L) are uniformly distributed throughout the scan region of interest (ROI). The present work extends these investigations to quantitative evaluation of the extent to which clinically realistic soft tissue inhomogeneities external to the bone within the DXA scan ROI affect patient-specific in vivo BMD measurement inaccuracies. The results are particularly relevant to patient-specific lumbar vertebral and proximal femoral sites. Norland, Hologic, and Lunar DXA scans and corresponding DXA simulation studies of the same set of 225 different phantom arrays were carried out. The phantoms were specially fabricated absorptiometric replications of bone mineral material (B), red marrow (RM), and yellow marrow (YM) mixtures, and extraosseous F and L combinations spanning the anthropometric ranges encountered clinically. The three different DXA scanners yielded BMD results that effectively coincided, were in excellent agreement with the findings of the present corresponding DXA-simulation studies in each case, and confirmed the validity of the DXA BMD inaccuracy analysis formalism. It was found that only relatively small extraosseous soft tissue inhomogeneities within the ROI of DXA BMD scans can increase substantially the already sizable BMD inaccuracies shown earlier to pertain for uniformly distributed extraosseous soft tissues. The extent of these in vivo BMD inaccuracies (%) are shown to depend on the mean extraosseous F-to-L areal density ratio and its degree of nonuniformity within the local bone scan ROI, the marrow thickness and specific composition, and the actual BMD in any given case. It was found that patient-specific DXA-measured in vivo BMD inaccuracies can, in many clinically encountered cases, be as large as 20-50%, particularly so for osteopenic, osteoporotic, and elderly patients. It is concluded that, because these DXA in vivo BMD inaccuracies are unavoidable and clinically unpredictable, diagnoses/ prognoses of bone fragility and evaluations of bone responsiveness to treatment of individual patients based mainly on DXA in vivo BMD measurements can be unreliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12817754     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.1020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  39 in total

1.  Body mass index and bone loss among postmenopausal women: the 10-year follow-up of the OSTPRE cohort.

Authors:  Jarmo Saarelainen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Heikki Kröger; Marjo Tuppurainen; Leo Niskanen; Jukka Jurvelin; Risto Honkanen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Bone health and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Erin Gorman; Anna M Chudyk; Kenneth M Madden; Maureen C Ashe
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 3.  Examining the link between bariatric surgery, bone loss, and osteoporosis: a review of bone density studies.

Authors:  Lesley M Scibora; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Henry Buchwald; Moira A Petit
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.

Authors:  W D Leslie; A Moayyeri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  MRI-measured bone marrow adipose tissue is inversely related to DXA-measured bone mineral in Caucasian women.

Authors:  W Shen; J Chen; M Punyanitya; S Shapses; S Heshka; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Relationship between MRI-measured bone marrow adipose tissue and hip and spine bone mineral density in African-American and Caucasian participants: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Rebecca Scherzer; Madeleine Gantz; Jun Chen; Mark Punyanitya; Cora E Lewis; Carl Grunfeld
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  The relationship between body composition and bone mineral content: threshold effects in a racially and ethnically diverse group of men.

Authors:  T G Travison; A B Araujo; G R Esche; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.