Literature DB >> 21403849

The effect of fat on the measurement of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR-BMD).

Edward Colt1, Johan Kälvesten, Kenneth Cook, Nata Khramov, Fahad Javed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown that surrounding fat causes an increase of up to 21% in bone mineral density (BMD) measured by Lunar 'Intelligent DXA' (iDXA), one of the latest generation dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners [1]. The purpose of our study was to see if it was possible to avoid this artifact when measuring the BMD of metacarpals II, III, and IV by digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR).
METHODS: We took X-rays of the bones of a cadaveric left hand which were immobilized in a wooden cradle to preserve an approximate in vivo configuration. The X-rays were digitized into Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files which were analyzed using dxr-online (dxr-online, Sectra, Sweden) which uses the same DXR-BMD algorithm previously used by Pronosco X-posure v2 and Sectra Osteoporosis package. The X-rays were repeated four times. We then surrounded the bones with a layer of lard, and again X-rayed four times. This process was repeated with the bones were covered by two layers, and then three layers of lard.
RESULTS: The measured DXR-BMD increased by a maximum of 0.44% when the metacarpals were covered by either two or three layers of lard compared with when the metacarpals were not covered by lard.
CONCLUSION: The measurement of metacarpal BMD measured by DXR is minimally affected by surrounding lard. The measurement of metacarpal BMD by DXR seems to be a way of avoiding the artifactual change in BMD caused by fat, when it is measured by DXA.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21403849      PMCID: PMC3056020     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res        ISSN: 1479-456X


  13 in total

1.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision.

Authors:  J T Jørgensen; P B Andersen; A Rosholm; N H Bjarnason
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  2000-09

2.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  The relative contributions of lean tissue mass and fat mass to bone density in young women.

Authors:  M C Wang; L K Bachrach; M Van Loan; M Hudes; K M Flegal; P B Crawford
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.

Authors:  S Grampp; H K Genant; A Mathur; P Lang; M Jergas; M Takada; C C Glüer; Y Lu; M Chavez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Relation of body composition, fat mass, and serum lipids to osteoporotic fractures and bone mineral density in Chinese men and women.

Authors:  Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Scott A Venners; Henry A Terwedow; Yan Feng; Tianhua Niu; Zhiping Li; Nan Laird; Joseph D Brain; Steve R Cummings; Mary L Bouxsein; Cliff J Rosen; Xiping Xu
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; S K Grimston; K C Fischer; R Pacifici
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.

Authors:  H H Bolotin; H Sievänen; J L Grashuis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and vertebral fracture risk in elderly women: a prospective analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; L Palermo; C Yeung; D M Black
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: the Framingham study.

Authors:  D T Felson; Y Zhang; M T Hannan; J J Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Effect of fat on measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  F Javed; W Yu; J Thornton; E Colt
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2009-07-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Influence of angulation on metacarpal bone mineral density measurements using digital X-ray radiogrammetry.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Diane M Renz; Rosemarie Fröber; Andreas Hansch; Gabriele Lehmann; Julia Sommerfeld; Ansgar Malich; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Reference values for digital X-ray radiogrammetry parameters in children and adolescents in comparison to estimates in patients with distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Diane M Renz; Ansgar Malich; Andreas Ulrich; Alexander Pfeil; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Florian Streitparth; Martin H Maurer; Ulf K Teichgräber; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Sex Differences in Bone Health Among Indian Older Adults with Obesity, Sarcopenia, and Sarcopenic Obesity.

Authors:  Anoohya Gandham; David Scott; Maxine P Bonham; Bharati Kulkarni; Sanjay Kinra; Peter R Ebeling; Ayse Zengin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Comparison of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computerized tomography with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring bone mineral density.

Authors:  E Colt; M Akram; F X Pi Sunyer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.016

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.