Literature DB >> 1393420

Errors due to non-uniform distribution of fat in dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

P Tothill1, D W Pye.   

Abstract

Errors in spinal dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were studied by analysing X-ray CT scans taken for diagnostic purposes on 20 patients representing a wide range of fat content. The mean difference between the fat thickness over the vertebral bodies and that over a background area in antero-posterior (AP) scanning was 6.7 +/- 8.1 mm for men and 13.4 +/- 4.7 mm for women. For lateral scanning the mean fat thickness difference was only 4 mm for both sexes, but the dispersion was greater, with a standard deviation of 15 mm. To relate these differences to errors in bone mineral, measurements were made of the bone mineral equivalence of fat-equivalent materials on DXA machines from three manufacturers. 10 mm of adipose tissue was equivalent to -0.043 g/cm2 of hydroxyapatite. For AP scanning a non-uniform fat distribution leads to a mean overestimate of 0.029 g/cm2 for men and 0.057 g/cm2 for women. The error exceeded 0.1 g/cm2 in 10% of slices. For lateral scanning the error exceeded 0.1 g/cm2 (about 15% of normal) in a quarter of slices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393420     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.

Authors:  M Salleh M Ardawi; Abdulraouf A Maimany; Talal M Bahksh; Hasan A N Nasrat; Waleed A Milaat; Raja M Al-Raddadi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Does high-intensity resistance training maintain bone mass during moderate weight loss in older overweight adults with type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  Robin M Daly; David W Dunstan; Neville Owen; Damien Jolley; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Assessing bone mass in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Tishya A L Wren; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A European multicenter comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurement variables: the OPUS study.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; R Barkmann; C C Glüer; C Roux; D M Reid; D Felsenberg; M Bradburn; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Body composition and bone mineral density in childhood.

Authors:  Lisa B Rokoff; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Karen M Switkowski; Jessica G Young; Clifford J Rosen; Emily Oken; Abby F Fleisch
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M A Sabin; G M Blake; S M MacLaughlin-Black; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Phantom studies in osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Fischer; B Kempers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-05

9.  Overweight postmenopausal women lose bone with moderate weight reduction and 1 g/day calcium intake.

Authors:  Claudia S Riedt; Mariana Cifuentes; Theodore Stahl; Hasina A Chowdhury; Yvette Schlussel; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Effect of oral bisphosphonates on bone mineral density and body composition in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  S P Conway; B Oldroyd; A Morton; J G Truscott; D G Peckham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.