Literature DB >> 28128707

Distinguishing between Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis with MR Elastography.

Meng Yin1, Kevin J Glaser1, Armando Manduca1, Taofic Mounajjed1, Harmeet Malhi1, Douglas A Simonetto1, Ruisi Wang1, Liu Yang1, Shennen A Mao1, Jaime M Glorioso1, Faysal M Elgilani1, Christopher J Ward1, Peter C Harris1, Scott L Nyberg1, Vijay H Shah1, Richard L Ehman1.   

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived mechanical properties in the discrimination of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in the early stages of chronic liver diseases. Materials and Methods All studies were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. A total of 187 animals were studied, including 182 mice and five pigs. These animals represented five different liver diseases with a varying combination and extent of hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, congestion, and portal hypertension. Multifrequency three-dimensional MR elastography was performed, and shear stiffness, storage modulus, shear loss modulus, and damping ratio were calculated for all animals. Necroinflammation, fibrosis, and portal pressure were either histologically scored or biochemically and physically quantified in all animals. Two-sided Welch t tests were used to evaluate mean differences between disease and control groups. Spearman correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between mechanical parameters and quantitative fibrosis extent (hydroxyproline concentration) and portal pressure. Results Liver stiffness and storage modulus increased with progressively developed fibrosis and portal hypertension (mean stiffness at 80 Hz and 48-week feeding, 0.51 kPa ± 0.12 in the steatohepatitis group vs 0.29 kPa ± 0.01 in the control group; P = .02). Damping ratio and shear loss modulus can be used to distinguish inflammation from fibrosis at early stages of disease, even before the development of histologically detectable necroinflammation and fibrosis (mean damping ratio at 80 Hz and 20-week feeding, 0.044 ± 0.012 in the steatohepatitis group vs 0.014 ± 0.008 in the control group; P < .001). Damping ratio and liver stiffness vary differently with respect to cause of portal hypertension (ie, congestion- or cirrhosis-induced hypertension). These differentiation abilities have frequency-dependent variations. Conclusion Liver stiffness and damping ratio measurements can extend hepatic MR elastography to potentially enable assessment of necroinflammatory, congestive, and fibrotic processes of chronic liver diseases. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28128707      PMCID: PMC5529282          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017160622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  36 in total

1.  Clinical application of transient elastography in prediction of portal hypertension related complication in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Magdy Al-Dahshan
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Levels of alanine aminotransferase confound use of transient elastography to diagnose fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Eric B Cohen; Keyur Patel; Bruce Bacon; Stuart Gordon; Eric Lawitz; David Nelson; Imad A Nasser; Tracy Challies; Nezam Afdhal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Complementary vascular and matrix regulatory pathways underlie the beneficial mechanism of action of sorafenib in liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Dominique Thabut; Chittaranjan Routray; Gwen Lomberk; Uday Shergill; Kevin Glaser; Robert Huebert; Leena Patel; Tetyana Masyuk; Boris Blechacz; Andrew Vercnocke; Erik Ritman; Richard Ehman; Raul Urrutia; Vijay Shah
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Chronic Phenotype Characterization of a Large-Animal Model of Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type 1.

Authors:  Faysal Elgilani; Shennen A Mao; Jaime M Glorioso; Meng Yin; Ianko D Iankov; Anisha Singh; Bruce Amiot; Piero Rinaldo; Ronald J Marler; Richard L Ehman; Markus Grompe; Joseph B Lillegard; Raymond D Hickey; Scott L Nyberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Temel Kaya Yasar; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; Stephan Kannengiesser; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.

Authors:  Patrick Asbach; Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Jürgen Braun; Rajan Somasundaram; Bernd Hamm; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  High Resolution Imaging of Viscoelastic Properties of Intracranial Tumours by Multi-Frequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  M Reiss-Zimmermann; K-J Streitberger; I Sack; J Braun; F Arlt; D Fritzsch; K-T Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation.

Authors:  Philippe Garteiser; Sabrina Doblas; Jean-Luc Daire; Mathilde Wagner; Helena Leitao; Valérie Vilgrain; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  39 in total

1.  Quantitative ultrasound and machine learning for assessment of steatohepatitis in a rat model.

Authors:  An Tang; François Destrempes; Siavash Kazemirad; Julian Garcia-Duitama; Bich N Nguyen; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Congestive hepatopathy: Differentiating congestion from fibrosis.

Authors:  Alexander Lemmer; Lisa VanWagner; Daniel Ganger
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-01-02

3.  Prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) with multiparametric hepatic magnetic resonance imaging and elastography.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Matthew C Murphy; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Amy S Mauer; Taofic Mounajjed; Terry M Therneau; Heshan Liu; Harmeet Malhi; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Role of imaging-based biomarkers in NAFLD: Recent advances in clinical application and future research directions.

Authors:  Rohit Loomba
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  The Role of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Alina M Allen; Vijay H Shah; Terry M Therneau; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Taofic Mounajjed; Joseph J Larson; Kristin C Mara; Phillip J Schulte; Todd A Kellogg; Michael L Kendrick; Travis J McKenzie; Suzanne M Greiner; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Michael L Wells; Jun Chen; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 7.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver.

Authors:  Jiahui Li; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Meng Yin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Rheological determinants for simultaneous staging of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Ralph Sinkus; Simon Lambert; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Caryn Morse; Theo Heller; Christian Guenthner; Ahmed M Ghanem; Sverre Holm; Ahmed M Gharib
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.