M Reiss-Zimmermann1, K-J Streitberger2, I Sack2, J Braun2, F Arlt3, D Fritzsch4, K-T Hoffmann4. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. martin.reiss-zimmermann@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 2. Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. 4. Department of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In recent years Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) emerged into a clinically applicable imaging technique. It has been shown that MRE is capable of measuring global changes of the viscoelastic properties of cerebral tissue. The purpose of our study was to evaluate a spatially resolved three-dimensional multi-frequent MRE (3DMMRE) for assessment of the viscoelastic properties of intracranial tumours. METHODS: A total of 27 patients (63 ± 13 years) were included. All examinations were performed on a 3.0 T scanner, using a modified phase-contrast echo planar imaging sequence. We used 7 vibration frequencies in the low acoustic range with a temporal resolution of 8 dynamics per wave cycle. Post-processing included multi-frequency dual elasto-visco (MDEV) inversion to generate high-resolution maps of the magnitude |G*| and the phase angle φ of the complex valued shear modulus. RESULTS: The tumour entities included in this study were: glioblastoma (n = 11), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 3), meningioma (n = 7), cerebral metastasis (n = 5) and intracerebral abscess formation (n = 1). Primary brain tumours and cerebral metastases were not distinguishable in terms of |G*| and φ. Glioblastoma presented the largest range of |G*| values and a trend was delineable that glioblastoma were slightly softer than WHO grade III tumours. In terms of φ, meningiomas were clearly distinguishable from all other entities. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, while analysing the viscoelastic constants of various intracranial tumour entities with an improved spatial resolution, it was possible to characterize intracranial tumours by their mechanical properties. We were able to clearly delineate meningiomas from intraaxial tumours, while for the latter group an overlap remains in viscoelastic terms.
PURPOSE: In recent years Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) emerged into a clinically applicable imaging technique. It has been shown that MRE is capable of measuring global changes of the viscoelastic properties of cerebral tissue. The purpose of our study was to evaluate a spatially resolved three-dimensional multi-frequent MRE (3DMMRE) for assessment of the viscoelastic properties of intracranial tumours. METHODS: A total of 27 patients (63 ± 13 years) were included. All examinations were performed on a 3.0 T scanner, using a modified phase-contrast echo planar imaging sequence. We used 7 vibration frequencies in the low acoustic range with a temporal resolution of 8 dynamics per wave cycle. Post-processing included multi-frequency dual elasto-visco (MDEV) inversion to generate high-resolution maps of the magnitude |G*| and the phase angle φ of the complex valued shear modulus. RESULTS: The tumour entities included in this study were: glioblastoma (n = 11), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 3), meningioma (n = 7), cerebral metastasis (n = 5) and intracerebral abscess formation (n = 1). Primary brain tumours and cerebral metastases were not distinguishable in terms of |G*| and φ. Glioblastoma presented the largest range of |G*| values and a trend was delineable that glioblastoma were slightly softer than WHO grade III tumours. In terms of φ, meningiomas were clearly distinguishable from all other entities. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, while analysing the viscoelastic constants of various intracranial tumour entities with an improved spatial resolution, it was possible to characterize intracranial tumours by their mechanical properties. We were able to clearly delineate meningiomas from intraaxial tumours, while for the latter group an overlap remains in viscoelastic terms.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Philippe Garteiser; Sabrina Doblas; Jean-Luc Daire; Mathilde Wagner; Helena Leitao; Valérie Vilgrain; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marco Essig; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Mark S Shiroishi; Marc Saake; James M Provenzale; David S Enterline; Nicoletta Anzalone; Arnd Dörfler; Àlex Rovira; Max Wintermark; Meng Law Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Andreas Fehlner; Sebastian Papazoglou; Matthew D McGarry; Keith D Paulsen; Jing Guo; Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Sebastian Hirsch; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 4.044