Literature DB >> 18666132

Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.

Patrick Asbach1, Dieter Klatt, Uwe Hamhaber, Jürgen Braun, Rajan Somasundaram, Bernd Hamm, Ingolf Sack.   

Abstract

MR elastography (MRE) allows the noninvasive assessment of the viscoelastic properties of human organs based on the organ response to oscillatory shear stress. Shear waves of a given frequency are mechanically introduced and the propagation is imaged by applying motion-sensitive gradients. An experiment was set up that introduces multifrequency shear waves combined with broadband motion sensitization to extend the dynamic range of MRE from one given frequency to, in this study, four different frequencies. With this approach, multiple wave images corresponding to the four driving frequencies are simultaneously acquired and can be evaluated with regard to the dispersion of the complex modulus over the respective frequency. A viscoelastic model based on two shear moduli and one viscosity parameter was used to reproduce the experimental wave speed and wave damping dispersion. The technique was applied in eight healthy volunteers and eight patients with biopsy-proven high-grade liver fibrosis (grade 3-4). Fibrotic liver had a significantly higher (P < 0.01) viscosity (14.4 +/- 6.6 Pa x s) and elastic moduli (2.91 +/- 0.84 kPa; 4.83 +/- 1.77 kPa) than the viscosity (7.3 +/- 2.3 Pa x s) and elastic moduli (1.16 +/- 0.28 kPa; 1.97 +/- 0.30 kPa) of normal volunteers. Multifrequency MRE is well suited for the noninvasive differentiation of normal and fibrotic liver as it allows the measurement of rheologic material properties. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666132     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  87 in total

1.  [Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver].

Authors:  I Sack; T Fischer; A Thomas; J Braun
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Adam J Pattison; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Daniel V Litwiller; Yogesh K Mariappan; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Nonconventional MRI and microstructural cerebral changes in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Christian Enzinger; Frederik Barkhof; Olga Ciccarelli; Massimo Filippi; Ludwig Kappos; Maria A Rocca; Stefan Ropele; Àlex Rovira; Torben Schneider; Nicola de Stefano; Hugo Vrenken; Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott; Jens Wuerfel; Franz Fazekas
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Rohit Loomba; Zhen Wang; Claude Sirlin; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Frank H Miller; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Edmund M Godfrey; Patrick Asbach; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Viscoelastic properties of normal and infarcted myocardium measured by a multifrequency shear wave method: comparison with pressure-segment length method.

Authors:  Cristina Pislaru; Matthew W Urban; Sorin V Pislaru; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Utility of preoperative meningioma consistency measurement with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): a review.

Authors:  Alexander G Chartrain; Mehmet Kurt; Amy Yao; Rui Feng; Kambiz Nael; J Mocco; Joshua B Bederson; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 10.  Abdominal magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.