Literature DB >> 28124572

Can image enhancement allow radiation dose to be reduced whilst maintaining the perceived diagnostic image quality required for coronary angiography?

Anuja Joshi1, Amber J Gislason-Lee1, Claire Keeble1,2, Uduvil M Sivananthan3, Andrew G Davies1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to quantify the reduction in radiation dose facilitated by image processing alone for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patient angiograms, without reducing the perceived image quality required to confidently make a diagnosis.
METHODS: Incremental amounts of image noise were added to five PCI angiograms, simulating the angiogram as having been acquired at corresponding lower dose levels (10-89% dose reduction). 16 observers with relevant experience scored the image quality of these angiograms in 3 states-with no image processing and with 2 different modern image processing algorithms applied. These algorithms are used on state-of-the-art and previous generation cardiac interventional X-ray systems. Ordinal regression allowing for random effects and the delta method were used to quantify the dose reduction possible by the processing algorithms, for equivalent image quality scores.
RESULTS: Observers rated the quality of the images processed with the state-of-the-art and previous generation image processing with a 24.9% and 15.6% dose reduction, respectively, as equivalent in quality to the unenhanced images. The dose reduction facilitated by the state-of-the-art image processing relative to previous generation processing was 10.3%.
CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that statistically significant dose reduction can be facilitated with no loss in perceived image quality using modern image enhancement; the most recent processing algorithm was more effective in preserving image quality at lower doses. Advances in knowledge: Image enhancement was shown to maintain perceived image quality in coronary angiography at a reduced level of radiation dose using computer software to produce synthetic images from real angiograms simulating a reduction in dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28124572      PMCID: PMC5601531          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment.

Authors:  Magnus Båth; Markus Håkansson; Jonny Hansson; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality.

Authors:  M J Tapiovaara
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment.

Authors:  Claire Keeble; Paul D Baxter; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Laura A Treadgold; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Interventional cardiologists and risk of radiation-induced cataract: results of a French multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Sophie Jacob; Serge Boveda; Olivier Bar; Antoine Brézin; Carlo Maccia; Dominique Laurier; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Dose optimization in cardiac x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Catherine McMillan; Arnold R Cowen; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; John W Hopewell; Donald L Miller; Louis K Wagner; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients.

Authors:  Michael Söderman; Maria Mauti; Sjirk Boon; Artur Omar; María Marteinsdóttir; Tommy Andersson; Staffan Holmin; Bart Hoornaert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, region, and age: statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations.

Authors:  Judith A Finegold; Perviz Asaria; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography.

Authors:  T Ten Cate; M van Wely; H Gehlmann; M Mauti; C Camaro; N Reifart; H Suryapranata; M J de Boer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.