Literature DB >> 18252851

Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality.

M J Tapiovaara1.   

Abstract

Some of the findings of a review of the relationship between physical measurements and clinical image quality have been summarised. Mixed results were found: some studies had no relationship at presently typical dose levels, whereas others had a clear correlation between them. It is concluded that the various image quality evaluation tasks in an X-ray department are best done by different methods. Presently, exact physical measurements cannot supersede subjective evaluation in judging the acceptability of clinical images, whereas they are indispensable in specification and testing of technical performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18252851     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  13 in total

1.  The status of Spain's dental practice following the European Union directive concerning radiological installations: 11 years on (1996-2007).

Authors:  M Alcaraz; E Velasco; Y Martínez-Beneyto; F Velasco; D Armero; C Parra; M Canteras
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Cone beam CT dose reduction in prostate radiotherapy using Likert scale methods.

Authors:  Keith A Langmack; Louise A Newton; Suzanne Jordan; Ruth Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Can image enhancement allow radiation dose to be reduced whilst maintaining the perceived diagnostic image quality required for coronary angiography?

Authors:  Anuja Joshi; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Uduvil M Sivananthan; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Development and validation of a visual grading scale for assessing image quality of AP pelvis radiographic images.

Authors:  Hussien A A B Mraity; Andrew England; Simon Cassidy; Peter Eachus; Alejandro Dominguez; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.

Authors:  M H Smet; L Breysem; E Mussen; H Bosmans; N W Marshall; L Cockmartin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Analysis of the priority of anatomic structures according to the diagnostic task in cone-beam computed tomographic images.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-12-20

7.  Agreement between objective and subjective assessment of image quality in ultrasound abdominal aortic aneurism screening.

Authors:  S Wolstenhulme; A G Davies; C Keeble; S Moore; J A Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Susanne Ohlmann-Knafo; Melanie Morlo; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; Barbara Grabowski; Melanie Kaspar; Dirk Pickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors.

Authors:  Sorin Teich; Wisam Al-Rawi; Masahiro Heima; Fady F Faddoul; Gil Goldzweig; Zvi Gutmacher; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.607

10.  Initial quality performance results using a phantom to simulate chest computed radiography.

Authors:  Wilbroad Muhogora; Renato Padovani; Peter Msaki
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.