Jonathan L Preston1,2, Tara McAllister3, Emily Phillips2, Suzanne Boyce2,4, Mark Tiede2, Jackie S Kim5, Douglas H Whalen6. 1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY. 2. Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT. 3. Department of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University, New York. 4. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, OH. 5. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Columbia University, New York, NY. 6. Program in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore how the frequency with which ultrasound visual feedback (UVF) is provided during speech therapy affects speech sound learning. Method: Twelve children with residual speech errors affecting /ɹ/ participated in a multiple-baseline across-subjects design with 2 treatment conditions. One condition featured 8 hr of high-frequency UVF (HF; feedback on 89% of trials), whereas the other included 8 hr of lower-frequency UVF (LF; 44% of trials). The order of treatment conditions was counterbalanced across participants. All participants were treated on vocalic /ɹ/. Progress was tracked by measuring generalization on /ɹ/ in untreated words. Results: After the 1st treatment phase, participants who received the HF condition outperformed those who received LF. At the end of the 2-phase treatment, within-participant comparisons showed variability across individual outcomes in both HF and LF conditions. However, a group level analysis of this small sample suggested that participants whose treatment order was HF-LF made larger gains than those whose treatment order was LF-HF. Conclusions: The order HF-LF may represent a preferred order for UVF in speech therapy. This is consistent with empirical work and theoretical arguments suggesting that visual feedback may be particularly beneficial in the early stages of acquiring new speech targets.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore how the frequency with which ultrasound visual feedback (UVF) is provided during speech therapy affects speech sound learning. Method: Twelve children with residual speech errors affecting /ɹ/ participated in a multiple-baseline across-subjects design with 2 treatment conditions. One condition featured 8 hr of high-frequency UVF (HF; feedback on 89% of trials), whereas the other included 8 hr of lower-frequency UVF (LF; 44% of trials). The order of treatment conditions was counterbalanced across participants. All participants were treated on vocalic /ɹ/. Progress was tracked by measuring generalization on /ɹ/ in untreated words. Results: After the 1st treatment phase, participants who received the HF condition outperformed those who received LF. At the end of the 2-phase treatment, within-participant comparisons showed variability across individual outcomes in both HF and LF conditions. However, a group level analysis of this small sample suggested that participants whose treatment order was HF-LF made larger gains than those whose treatment order was LF-HF. Conclusions: The order HF-LF may represent a preferred order for UVF in speech therapy. This is consistent with empirical work and theoretical arguments suggesting that visual feedback may be particularly beneficial in the early stages of acquiring new speech targets.
Authors: Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister Byun; Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah Hamilton; Mark Tiede; Emily Phillips; Ahmed Rivera-Campos; Douglas H Whalen Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Shannon N Austermann Hula; Donald A Robin; Edwin Maas; Kirrie J Ballard; Richard A Schmidt Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Nina R Benway; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister; Graham Tomkins Feeny; Jennifer Hill; Jonathan L Preston Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.408