Literature DB >> 29546269

Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy?

Jonathan L Preston1, Gabriela Holliman-Lopez2, Megan C Leece1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound visual feedback of the tongue is increasingly used as a component of speech therapy in clinical research and practice. The purpose is to offer a preliminary summary of the nature of participant-reported undesired effects related to ultrasound visual feedback. Method: Sixty-two participants across 3 sites (mean age = 11.9 years) and 38 parents responded to a 2-item verbal questionnaire following 14-16 hr of treatment regarding any aspects of the treatment they did not like. Responses were thematically categorized.
Results: The 62 participants provided 65 distinct responses, which were categorized as follows: 31% no concerns, 40% gel-related (e.g., cold, sticky), 21% positioning of the probe (e.g., uncomfortable, annoying), 3% chin hurting (qualified as being minor in nature), and 5% other (i.e., unrelated to the use of the ultrasound). Responses from all parents suggested no concerns about the use of ultrasound; however, 8% expressed concerns unrelated to ultrasound use (e.g., fatigue).
Conclusion: These data inform clinicians and researchers about participant's experience and highlight the type of comments most likely to be encountered with ultrasound in speech therapy. Although the reported adverse effects can be considered minor, they should be weighed against the potential benefits of visual feedback in treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546269      PMCID: PMC6105118          DOI: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  21 in total

1.  Ultrasound in speech therapy with adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Barbara Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Marcy Adler-Bock
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister Byun; Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah Hamilton; Mark Tiede; Emily Phillips; Ahmed Rivera-Campos; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Acquisition, retention, and generalization of rhotics with and without ultrasound visual feedback.

Authors:  Greta M Sjolie; Megan C Leece; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Ultrasound biofeedback for speech training. Instrumentation and preliminary results.

Authors:  T H Shawker; B C Sonies
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders.

Authors:  Joanne Cleland; James M Scobbie; Alan A Wrench
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Elaine R Hitchcock; Michelle T Swartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 8.  Contact dermatitis due to ultrasound gel: A case report and published work review.

Authors:  François Chasset; Angèle Soria; Philippe Moguelet; Alexis Mathian; Yvain Auger; Camille Francès; Stéphane Barete
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.005

9.  Ultrasound as visual feedback in speech habilitation: exploring consultative use in rural British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  May B Bernhardt; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Marcy Adler-Bock; Reiko Shimizu; Audrey Cheney; Nathan Giesbrecht; Maureen O'connell; Jason Sirianni; Bosko Radanov
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Variable Practice to Enhance Speech Learning in Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Single Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Kerry McNamara; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of auto-contouring and hand-contouring of ultrasound images of the tongue surface.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Wei-Rong Chen; Rion Iwasaki; Jaekoo Kang; Boram Kim; Ghada Shejaeya; Mark K Tiede; D H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.