Literature DB >> 28112940

Adaptive Landscape Flattening Accelerates Sampling of Alchemical Space in Multisite λ Dynamics.

Ryan L Hayes1, Kira A Armacost1, Jonah Z Vilseck1, Charles L Brooks1,2.   

Abstract

Multisite λ dynamics (MSλD) is a powerful emerging method in free energy calculation that allows prediction of relative free energies for a large set of compounds from very few simulations. Calculating free energy differences between substituents that constitute large volume or flexibility jumps in chemical space is difficult for free energy methods in general, and for MSλD in particular, due to large free energy barriers in alchemical space. This study demonstrates that a simple biasing potential can flatten these barriers and introduces an algorithm that determines system specific biasing potential coefficients. Two sources of error, deep traps at the end points and solvent disruption by hard-core potentials, are identified. Both scale with the size of the perturbed substituent and are removed by sharp biasing potentials and a new soft-core implementation, respectively. MSλD with landscape flattening is demonstrated on two sets of molecules: derivatives of the heat shock protein 90 inhibitor geldanamycin and derivatives of benzoquinone. In the benzoquinone system, landscape flattening leads to 2 orders of magnitude improvement in transition rates between substituents and robust solvation free energies. Landscape flattening opens up new applications for MSλD by enabling larger chemical perturbations to be sampled with improved precision and accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28112940      PMCID: PMC5824625          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  27 in total

1.  New Soft-Core Potential Function for Molecular Dynamics Based Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions in Fragment Optimization.

Authors:  Thomas B Steinbrecher; Markus Dahlgren; Daniel Cappel; Teng Lin; Lingle Wang; Goran Krilov; Robert Abel; Richard Friesner; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems.

Authors:  Lianqing Zheng; Mengen Chen; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  A water-swap reaction coordinate for the calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energies.

Authors:  Christopher J Woods; Maturos Malaisree; Supot Hannongbua; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Comparison of enveloping distribution sampling and thermodynamic integration to calculate binding free energies of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase inhibitors.

Authors:  Sereina Riniker; Clara D Christ; Niels Hansen; Alan E Mark; Pramod C Nair; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

10.  Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2).

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Richard A Friesner; B J Berne
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  18 in total

1.  Exploring pH Dependent Host/Guest Binding Affinities.

Authors:  Thomas J Paul; Jonah Z Vilseck; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Predicting Binding Free Energies in a Large Combinatorial Chemical Space Using Multisite λ Dynamics.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Kira A Armacost; Ryan L Hayes; Garrett B Goh; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Computing Absolute Free Energy with Deep Generative Models.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Bin Zhang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Thomas J Paul; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Mutant thermal proteome profiling for characterization of missense protein variants and their associated phenotypes within the proteome.

Authors:  Sarah A Peck Justice; Monica P Barron; Guihong D Qi; H R Sagara Wijeratne; José F Victorino; Ed R Simpson; Jonah Z Vilseck; Aruna B Wijeratne; Amber L Mosley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Accurate PDZ/Peptide Binding Specificity with Additive and Polarizable Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Nicolas Panel; Francesco Villa; Ernesto J Fuentes; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Using the fast fourier transform in binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics and Rao-Blackwell Estimator for Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Jonah Z Vilseck; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.