Literature DB >> 29539396

Accurate PDZ/Peptide Binding Specificity with Additive and Polarizable Free Energy Simulations.

Nicolas Panel1, Francesco Villa1, Ernesto J Fuentes2, Thomas Simonson3.   

Abstract

PDZ domains contain 80-100 amino acids and bind short C-terminal sequences of target proteins. Their specificity is essential for cellular signaling pathways. We studied the binding of the Tiam1 PDZ domain to peptides derived from the C-termini of its Syndecan-1 and Caspr4 targets. We used free energy perturbation (FEP) to characterize the binding energetics of one wild-type and 17 mutant complexes by simulating 21 alchemical transformations between pairs of complexes. Thirteen complexes had known experimental affinities. FEP is a powerful tool to understand protein/ligand binding. It depends, however, on the accuracy of molecular dynamics force fields and conformational sampling. Both aspects require continued testing, especially for ionic mutations. For six mutations that did not modify the net charge, we obtained excellent agreement with experiment using the additive, AMBER ff99SB force field, with a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.37 kcal/mol. For six ionic mutations that modified the net charge, agreement was also good, with one large error (3 kcal/mol) and an RMSD of 0.9 kcal/mol for the other five. The large error arose from the overstabilization of a protein/peptide salt bridge by the additive force field. Four of the ionic mutations were also simulated with the polarizable Drude force field, which represents the first test of this force field for protein/ligand binding free energy changes. The large error was eliminated and the RMS error for the four mutations was reduced from 1.8 to 1.2 kcal/mol. The overall accuracy of FEP indicates it can be used to understand PDZ/peptide binding. Importantly, our results show that for ionic mutations in buried regions, electronic polarization plays a significant role.
Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29539396      PMCID: PMC5883551          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  69 in total

1.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

2.  Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study.

Authors:  Nathalie Basdevant; Harel Weinstein; Marco Ceruso
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  On the origin of the electrostatic potential difference at a liquid-vacuum interface.

Authors:  Edward Harder; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems.

Authors:  Lianqing Zheng; Mengen Chen; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Equivalence of M- and P-Summation in Calculations of Ionic Solvation Free Energies.

Authors:  Thomas Simonson; Gerhard Hummer; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  The Tiam1 PDZ domain couples to Syndecan1 and promotes cell-matrix adhesion.

Authors:  Tyson R Shepherd; Suzi M Klaus; Xu Liu; S Ramaswamy; Kris A DeMali; Ernesto J Fuentes
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Modeling Polarization in Proteins and Protein-ligand Complexes: Methods and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2005

8.  Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Paul Maragakis; Stefano Piana; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A specificity map for the PDZ domain family.

Authors:  Raffi Tonikian; Yingnan Zhang; Stephen L Sazinsky; Bridget Currell; Jung-Hua Yeh; Boris Reva; Heike A Held; Brent A Appleton; Marie Evangelista; Yan Wu; Xiaofeng Xin; Andrew C Chan; Somasekar Seshagiri; Laurence A Lasky; Chris Sander; Charles Boone; Gary D Bader; Sachdev S Sidhu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Polarizable Force Fields for Macromolecules: Microsecond Simulations of Proteins Using the Classical Drude Oscillator Model.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Pedro E M Lopes; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.475

View more
  6 in total

1.  Computational Design of PDZ-Peptide Binding.

Authors:  Nicolas Panel; Francesco Villa; Vaitea Opuu; David Mignon; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Improved Modeling of Cation-π and Anion-Ring Interactions Using the Drude Polarizable Empirical Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Rapid and accurate structure-based therapeutic peptide design using GPU accelerated thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Michael Garton; Carles Corbi-Verge; Yuan Hu; Satra Nim; Nadya Tarasova; Brad Sherborne; Philip M Kim
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-01-04

4.  Free Energy-Based Computational Methods for the Study of Protein-Peptide Binding Equilibria.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Alchemical Free Energy Calculations to Investigate Protein-Protein Interactions: the Case of the CDC42/PAK1 Complex.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta La Serra; Pietro Vidossich; Isabella Acquistapace; Anand K Ganesan; Marco De Vivo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.162

6.  Classical Drude Polarizable Force Field Model for Methyl Phosphate and Its Interactions with Mg2.

Authors:  Francesco Villa; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoît Roux; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.781

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.