Literature DB >> 25625324

Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Lingle Wang1, Yujie Wu, Yuqing Deng, Byungchan Kim, Levi Pierce, Goran Krilov, Dmitry Lupyan, Shaughnessy Robinson, Markus K Dahlgren, Jeremy Greenwood, Donna L Romero, Craig Masse, Jennifer L Knight, Thomas Steinbrecher, Thijs Beuming, Wolfgang Damm, Ed Harder, Woody Sherman, Mark Brewer, Ron Wester, Mark Murcko, Leah Frye, Ramy Farid, Teng Lin, David L Mobley, William L Jorgensen, Bruce J Berne, Richard A Friesner, Robert Abel.   

Abstract

Designing tight-binding ligands is a primary objective of small-molecule drug discovery. Over the past few decades, free-energy calculations have benefited from improved force fields and sampling algorithms, as well as the advent of low-cost parallel computing. However, it has proven to be challenging to reliably achieve the level of accuracy that would be needed to guide lead optimization (∼5× in binding affinity) for a wide range of ligands and protein targets. Not surprisingly, widespread commercial application of free-energy simulations has been limited due to the lack of large-scale validation coupled with the technical challenges traditionally associated with running these types of calculations. Here, we report an approach that achieves an unprecedented level of accuracy across a broad range of target classes and ligands, with retrospective results encompassing 200 ligands and a wide variety of chemical perturbations, many of which involve significant changes in ligand chemical structures. In addition, we have applied the method in prospective drug discovery projects and found a significant improvement in the quality of the compounds synthesized that have been predicted to be potent. Compounds predicted to be potent by this approach have a substantial reduction in false positives relative to compounds synthesized on the basis of other computational or medicinal chemistry approaches. Furthermore, the results are consistent with those obtained from our retrospective studies, demonstrating the robustness and broad range of applicability of this approach, which can be used to drive decisions in lead optimization.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25625324     DOI: 10.1021/ja512751q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  275 in total

1.  Toward Learned Chemical Perception of Force Field Typing Rules.

Authors:  Camila Zanette; Caitlin C Bannan; Christopher I Bayly; Josh Fass; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  AB-Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions.

Authors:  Sarah Sirin; James R Apgar; Eric M Bennett; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Dynamics and structural determinants of ligand recognition of the 5-HT6 receptor.

Authors:  Márton Vass; Balázs Jójárt; Ferenc Bogár; Gábor Paragi; György M Keserű; Ákos Tarcsay
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics and Rao-Blackwell Estimator for Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Jonah Z Vilseck; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Structure-based predictions of activity cliffs.

Authors:  Jarmila Husby; Giovanni Bottegoni; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  A Streamlined, General Approach for Computing Ligand Binding Free Energies and Its Application to GPCR-Bound Cholesterol.

Authors:  Reza Salari; Thomas Joseph; Ruchi Lohia; Jérôme Hénin; Grace Brannigan
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; William F Flynn; Junchao Xia; R S K Vijayan; Baofeng Zhang; Peng He; Ahmet Mentes; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.

Authors:  Christina Schindler; Friedrich Rippmann; Daniel Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.