| Literature DB >> 28075381 |
Yacong Bo1, Xueyuan Zhang2, Youli Wang3, Jie You4, Han Cui5, Yiwei Zhu6, Wei Pang7, Wei Liu8, Yugang Jiang9, Quanjun Lu10.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) may protect against mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there is still a lack of the n-3 PUFAs intervention in the elderly with MCI in China. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of n-3 PUFA supplementation on cognitive function in the Chinese elderly with MCI.Entities:
Keywords: basic cognitive aptitude tests; cognition; elderly; mild cognitive impairment; n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28075381 PMCID: PMC5295098 DOI: 10.3390/nu9010054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow of participants through the trial.
Baseline characteristics of subjects 1.
| Variable | Placebo ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 70.45 ± 6.82 2 | 71.75 ± 5.68 | 0.961 | 0.339 3 |
| Gender | 0.002 | 0.967 4 | ||
| Male | 25 | 26 | ||
| Female | 17 | 18 | ||
| Education level | 1.038 | 0.595 4 | ||
| Illiterate | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary school | 11 | 16 | ||
| Junior high school and above | 30 | 27 | ||
| EPA (%) | 0.96 ± 0.59 | 0.80 ± 0.16 | −1.728 | 0.088 3 |
| DHA (%) | 1.62 ± 0.43 | 1.55 ± 0.39 | −0.698 | 0.487 3 |
| AA (%) | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.875 | 0.384 3 |
| ALA (%) | 0.63 ± 0.17 | 0.68 ± 0.19 | −1.286 | 0.202 3 |
| LA (%) | 22.39 ± 3.26 | 22.34 ± 2.86 | −0.075 | 0.940 3 |
| BCAT | 33.17 ± 15.01 | 31.16 ± 15.41 | −0.612 | 0.542 3 |
| MMSE | 25.62 ± 1.68 | 25.11 ± 1.66 | −1.403 | 0.164 3 |
1 The fatty acids composition was expressed as a relative percentage of the total amount of fatty acids reported; 2 Mean ± standard deviation (SD); 3 Unpaired t-test; 4 Chi-square test. EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexenoic acid; AA: arachidonic acid; ALA: alpha linolenic acid; LA: linoleic acid, MMSE: Mini-mental State Examinatlon; BCAT: Basic Cognitive Aptitude Tests.
Changes in plasma PUFA levels of MCI patients 1.
| Baseline | After Treatment | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPA (%) | ||||
| Placebo ( | 0.96 ± 0.59 | 0.92 ± 0.58 2 | −0.05 ± 0.19 | <0.0001 3 |
| 0.80 ± 0.16 | 1.16 ± 0.56 | 0.36 ± 0.52 | ||
| DHA (%) | ||||
| Placebo ( | 1.62 ± 0.43 | 1.36 ± 0.42 2 | −0.25 ± 0.43 | <0.0001 3 |
| 1.55 ± 0.39 | 1.89 ± 0.56 2 | 0.34 ± 0.42 | ||
| AA (%) | ||||
| Placebo ( | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | −0.01 ± 0.05 | 0.066 |
| 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.01 ± 0.04 | ||
| ALA (%) | ||||
| Placebo ( | 0.63 ± 0.17 | 0.65 ± 0.15 | 0.003 ± 0.12 | 0.582 |
| 0.68 ± 0.19 | 0.68 ± 0.19 | 0.02 ± 0.20 | ||
| LA (%) | ||||
| Placebo ( | 22.39 ± 3.26 | 22.22 ± 3.02 | −0.17 ± 2.48 | 0.333 |
| 22.34 ± 2.86 | 21.67 ± 2.83 | −0.66 ± 2.15 | ||
1 Data expressed as mean ± SD; 2 Significantly different from baseline, p < 0.05; 3 Significantly different from placebo group, p < 0.05.
The effect of n-3 PUFAs on the BCAT scores of MCI patients 1.
| Outcome Measure | Overall BCAT Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After Treatment | Difference | ||
| PS | ||||
| Placebo ( | 5.62 ± 3.84 | 6.43 ± 4.62 | 0.81 ± 2.83 | 0.0002 3 |
| 5.22 ± 4.40 | 8.84 ± 4.65 2 | 3.61 ± 3.69 | ||
| MAE | ||||
| Placebo ( | 7.90 ± 5.33 | 8.70 ± 6.02 | 0.33 ± 3.58 | 0.055 |
| 7.09 ± 4.83 | 8.63 ± 4.60 | 2.09 ± 4.68 | ||
| SIE | ||||
| Placebo ( | 6.29 ± 3.38 | 6.28 ± 2.48 | 0.00 ± 3.22 | 0.0002 3 |
| 4.46 ± 2.34 | 6.81 ± 3.23 2 | 2.45 ± 2.72 | ||
| WM | ||||
| Placebo ( | 5.47 ± 3.80 | 6.85 ± 4.80 | 1.38 ± 2.66 | 0.0047 3 |
| 5.32 ± 2.92 | 8.63 ± 4.06 2 | 3.32 ± 3.45 | ||
| RM | ||||
| Placebo ( | 7.52 ± 4.85 | 9.50 ± 5.16 | 1.98 ± 3.13 | 0.579 |
| 9.32 ± 7.69 | 10.86 ± 6.71 | 1.55 ± 3.96 | ||
| Total | ||||
| Placebo ( | 33.17 ± 15.01 | 37.17 ± 16.85 | 4.00 ± 7.07 | <0.0001 3 |
| 31.16 ± 15.41 | 44.73 ± 13.87 2 | 13.57 ± 10.72 | ||
1 PS: perceptual speed; MAE: mental arithmetic efficiency; SIE: space imagery efficiency; WM: working memory; RM: recognition memory; 2 Significantly different from baseline, p < 0.05; 3 Significantly different from placebo group, p < 0.05.
Figure 2Changes in perceptual speed, mental arithmetic efficiency, space imagery efficiency, working memory, and recognition memory between n-3 PUFAs and control groups stratified by sex. Data represent mean changes over 6 months with SD. The n-3 PUFAs effect and significance level are based on independent samples t tests.
The effect of n-3 PUFAs on the plasma indicators levels of MCI patients 1.
| Baseline | After Treatment | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6, pg/mL | ||||
| Placebo ( | 120.90 ± 41.60 | 109.26 ± 37.21 | −11.64 ± 42.28 | 0.018 3 |
| | 120.60 ± 52.64 | 85.66 ± 53.01 2 | −34.94 ± 46.18 | |
| IL-10, ng/mL | ||||
| Placebo ( | 166.10 ± 70.54 | 152.43 ± 43.43 | −13.67 ± 67.74 | 0.649 |
| | 136.42 ± 48.96 | 128.69 ± 37.53 | −7.73 ± 71.22 | |
| TNF-α, fmol/mL | ||||
| Placebo ( | 17.17 ± 7.98 | 15.43 ± 5.01 | −1.74 ± 8.15 | 0.027 3 |
| | 19.00 ± 9.89 | 13.09 ± 7.86 2 | −5.91 ± 9.03 | |
| COX, U/L | ||||
| Placebo ( | 545.32 ± 146.12 | 539.92 ± 152.23 | −5.40 ± 169.98 | 0.259 |
| | 543.34 ± 146.81 | 579.94 ± 125.21 | 36.59 ± 172.64 | |
| LOX, IU/L | ||||
| Placebo ( | 128.83 ± 25.95 | 131.87 ± 21.10 | 3.04 ± 23.47 | 0.558 |
| | 118.30 ± 26.14 | 124.61 ± 24.27 | 6.31 ± 27.63 | |
| sPLA2, ng/L | ||||
| Placebo ( | 944.00 ± 201.36 | 940.47 ± 233.43 | −3.53 ± 267.60 | 0.052 3 |
| | 1002.55 ± 204.43 | 888.97 ± 211.82 2 | −113.58 ± 249.81 | |
1 Data expressed as mean ± SD; 2 Significantly different from baseline, p < 0.05; 3 Significantly different from placebo group, p < 0.05. IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-10: interleukin-10; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; COX: cyclooxygenase; LOX: lipoxygenase; sPLA2: secretory phospholipase A2.