Literature DB >> 28058551

Modified Frailty Index Predicts Morbidity and Mortality After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Harveshp Mogal1, Sarah A Vermilion1, Rebecca Dodson1, Fang-Chi Hsu2, Russell Howerton1, Perry Shen1, Clancy J Clark3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a disease of older adults, who may present with limited physiologic reserve. The authors hypothesized that a frailty index can predict postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS: All patients who underwent PD were identified in the 2005-2012 NSQIP Participant Use File. Patients undergoing emergency procedures, those with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of five, and those with a diagnosis of preoperative sepsis were excluded from the study. A modified frailty index (mFI) was defined by 11 variables within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) previously used for the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index. An mFI score of 0.27 or higher was defined as a high mFI. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 9986 patients (age 65 ± 12 years, 48.8% female) who underwent PD. Of these patients, 6.4% (n = 637) had a high mFI (>0.27). Increasing mFI was associated with higher prevalence of postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001) and 30-days mortality (p < 0.001). In the univariate analysis, high mFI was associated with increased morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-1.97; p < 0.001) and 30-days mortality (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.74-3.45; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, ASA classification, albumin level, and body mass index (BMI), high mFI remained an independent preoperative predictor of postoperative morbidity (OR 1.544; 95% CI 1.289-1.850; p < 0.0001) and 30-days mortality (OR 1.536; 95% CI 1.049-2.248; p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: High mFI is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality after PD and can aid in preoperative risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28058551      PMCID: PMC7064816          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5715-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  57 in total

1.  Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Jin He
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The assessment and management of older cancer patients: A SIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons' attitudes.

Authors:  F Ghignone; B L van Leeuwen; I Montroni; M G Huisman; P Somasundar; K L Cheung; R A Audisio; G Ugolini
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Preoperative frailty and quality of life as predictors of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Adrienne Saxton; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Can the physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system predict operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy?

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Hiroshi Takamori; Yasuo Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tanaka; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Frailty as a marker of adverse outcomes in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Meera R Chappidi; Max Kates; Hiten D Patel; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Deborah R Kaye; Nikolai A Sopko; Danny Lascano; Jen-Jane Liu; James McKiernan; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Treatment of lung cancer in elderly part II: small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Martin Weinmann; Branislav Jeremic; Michael Bamberg; Carsten Bokemeyer
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition.

Authors:  Yujiro Kirihara; Naoki Takahashi; Yasushi Hashimoto; Guido M Sclabas; Saboor Khan; Toshiyuki Moriya; Junichi Sakagami; Marianne Huebner; Michael G Sarr; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pre-operative prediction of pancreatic fistula: is it possible?

Authors:  Keith J Roberts; Rowland Storey; James Hodson; Andrew M Smith; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; William H Nealon; James S Goodwin; Courtney M Townsend; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Keith J Roberts; James Hodson; Homoyoon Mehrzad; Ravi Marudanayagam; Robert P Sutcliffe; Paolo Muiesan; John Isaac; Simon R Bramhall; Darius F Mirza
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  31 in total

1.  An Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Steven Walczak; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A C Panayi; A R Orkaby; D Sakthivel; Y Endo; D Varon; D Roh; D P Orgill; R L Neppl; H Javedan; S Bhasin; I Sinha
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Is It Time to Add Tumor Regression Grade into the ypN Category?

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Optimal Modified Frailty Index Cutoff in Older Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mary Garland; Fang-Chi Hsu; Perry Shen; Clancy J Clark
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  The immense heterogeneity of frailty in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Julia Pazniokas; Chirag Gandhi; Brianna Theriault; Meic Schmidt; Chad Cole; Fawaz Al-Mufti; Justin Santarelli; Christian A Bowers
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer patients: assessments and interventions for the pancreatic surgeon.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Caitlin E Jones; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2019-03-11

7.  Predicting postoperative delirium severity in older adults: The role of surgical risk and executive function.

Authors:  Heidi Lindroth; Lisa Bratzke; Sara Twadell; Paul Rowley; Janie Kildow; Mara Danner; Lily Turner; Brandon Hernandez; Roger Brown; Robert D Sanders
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 3.485

8.  Frailty and emergency surgery in the elderly: protocol of a prospective, multicenter study in Italy for evaluating perioperative outcome (The FRAILESEL Study).

Authors:  Gianluca Costa; Giulia Massa
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-01-30

9.  Transanal endoscopic micro-surgery in elderly and very elderly patients: a safe option? Observational study with prospective data collection.

Authors:  X Serra-Aracil; S Serra-Pla; L Mora-Lopez; A Pallisera-Lloveras; M Labro-Ciurans; S Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Elie Chouillard; Mohamed Abu Hilal; Roland Croner; Brice Gayet; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.