Literature DB >> 20582514

Can the physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system predict operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy?

Daisuke Hashimoto1, Hiroshi Takamori, Yasuo Sakamoto, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masahiko Hirota, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mortality rates after pancreatic resection are now lower than 5% in high-volume centers; however, morbidity remains high. This stresses the importance of identifying accurate predictors of operative morbidity after pancreatic resection. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system was developed for a comparative audit of general surgical patients. Our previous study confirmed its usefulness for predicting morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. In the present study, we evaluated whether the E-PASS scoring system can predict the occurrence of complications after distal pancreatectomy (DP).
METHODS: The subjects were 46 patients who underwent DP for pancreatic disease. We studied correlations between the incidence of postoperative complications and the preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and comprehensive risk score (CRS) of the E-PASS scoring system.
RESULTS: A collective total of 20 postoperative complications developed in 13 (28.3%) of the 46 patients. All E-PASS scores, particularly PRS and CRS, were significantly higher in the patients with postoperative complications than in those without complications. The complication rate increased with increasing PRS, SSS, and CRS scores.
CONCLUSION: The E-PASS scoring system is useful for predicting morbidity after DP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20582514     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4112-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  25 in total

1.  Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Mark J Truty; Mark D Sawyer; Florencia G Que
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Transection using bipolar scissors reduces pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-08-01

3.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein: a case-matched comparison with conventional distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Carrère; Skander Abid; Charles Henri Julio; Eric Bloom; Bernard Pradère
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hironori Kaneko; Sumito Takagi; Yuichiro Otsuka; Masaru Tsuchiya; Akira Tamura; Toshio Katagiri; Tetsuya Maeda; Tadaaki Shiba
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Y Haga; S Ikei; M Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  The role of pancreatic leakage on rising of postoperative complications following pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Enrico Benzoni; Enrico Saccomano; Aron Zompicchiatti; Dario Lorenzin; Umberto Baccarani; Gian Luigi Adani; Alessandro Uzzau; Luigi Noce; Carla Cedolini; Fabrizio Bresadola; Dino De Anna; Sergio Intini
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: report of three cases.

Authors:  Akira Sasaki; Hiroyuki Nitta; Jun Nakajima; Toru Obuchi; Shigeaki Baba; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  DISPACT trial: a randomized controlled trial to compare two different surgical techniques of DIStal PAnCreaTectomy - study rationale and design.

Authors:  M K Diener; H P Knaebel; S T Witte; I Rossion; M Kieser; M W Buchler; C M Seiler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predicted morbidity and mortality in major gastroenterological surgery.

Authors:  Asgaut Viste
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) versus modified E-PASS for prediction of postoperative complications in elderly patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Kitano; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Junji Kurashige; Daisuke Kuroda; Keisuke Kosumi; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Yoshio Haga; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Using the E-PASS scoring system to estimate the risk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  Kenichi Koushi; Daisuke Korenaga; Hirofumi Kawanaka; Toshirou Okuyama; Yasuharu Ikeda; Kenji Takenaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Modified Frailty Index Predicts Morbidity and Mortality After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Harveshp Mogal; Sarah A Vermilion; Rebecca Dodson; Fang-Chi Hsu; Russell Howerton; Perry Shen; Clancy J Clark
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter Peng; Omar Hyder; Amin Firoozmand; Peter Kneuertz; Richard D Schulick; Donghang Huang; Martin Makary; Kenzo Hirose; Barish Edil; Michael A Choti; Joseph Herman; John L Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Modified frailty index predicts postoperative outcomes in older gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah A Vermillion; Fang-Chi Hsu; Robert D Dorrell; Perry Shen; Clancy J Clark
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Pancreatic cancer in the remnant pancreas following primary pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Masaki Ohmuraya; Kazuya Sakata; Keisuke Miyake; Hideyuki Kuroki; Masayuki Watanabe; Toru Beppu; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Usefulness of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) system for prediction of complication and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yili Dai; Guoqiao Chen; Yongle Chen; Zhaoqi Shi; Junhai Pan; Xiaoxiao Fan; Hui Lin
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 0.496

9.  Evaluation of the POSSUM, P-POSSUM and E-PASS scores in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Haolu Wang; Tao Chen; Xiaowen Liang; Yanyan Song; Jian Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.