Literature DB >> 23241871

Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition.

Yujiro Kirihara1, Naoki Takahashi, Yasushi Hashimoto, Guido M Sclabas, Saboor Khan, Toshiyuki Moriya, Junichi Sakagami, Marianne Huebner, Michael G Sarr, Michael B Farnell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether remnant pancreatic volume (RPV), subcutaneous/visceral adipose tissue(SAT/VAT) area, and skeletal muscle (SM) area calculated from preoperative computed tomography (CT) can predict the occurrence of pancreatic anastomotic failure (PAF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
BACKGROUND: Increased body mass index, small main pancreatic duct, and soft pancreatic texture are well-established predictors of PAF after PD. The impact on PAF of anthropomorphic measurements, such as RPV and body composition, is unknown.
METHODS: In 173 patients undergoing PD from 2004 to 2009, cross sections of SAT/VAT/SM area were quantitated volumetrically, respectively, from preoperative CT. RPV was calculated from the CT as the sum of pancreatic tissue area to the left of the presumed pancreatic transection site. The predictive ability for multiple models using combinations of body mass index, RPV, SAT/VAT area, SM area, main pancreatic duct size, and pancreatic gland texture was described using a concordance index (c-index).
RESULTS: Clinically relevant PAF occurred in 22 patients (13%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified RPV (P = 0.0012), VAT area (P = 0.0003), and SM area (P = 0.0006) as independent predictors of PAF. Using previously identified risk factors, the best 2-predictor model (body mass index and pancreatic duct size) resulted in a c-index of 0.748. Using anthropomorphic factors, however, the 2-predictor model using VAT and SM areas revealed a superior c-index of 0.959.
CONCLUSIONS: Our 2-predictor model using VAT area and SM area based on volumetric quantification using preoperative CT may offer clinical benefit as an objective prognostic measure to predict clinically relevant PAF after PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23241871     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827827d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  37 in total

1.  Predictive value of sarcopenia and visceral obesity for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy analyzed on clinically acquired CT and MRI.

Authors:  Minji Jang; Hyung Woo Park; Jimi Huh; Jong Hwa Lee; Yoong Ki Jeong; Yang Won Nah; Jisuk Park; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A novel preoperative predictor of pancreatic fistula using computed tomography after distal pancreatectomy with staple closure.

Authors:  Yasunari Fukuda; Daisaku Yamada; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Yoshifumi Iwagami; Takehiro Noda; Tadafumi Asaoka; Hiroshi Wada; Koichi Kawamoto; Kunihito Gotoh; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Is it time to standardize patient factors for HPB surgery?

Authors:  Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct.

Authors:  Ryoichi Miyamoto; Yukio Oshiro; Ken Nakayama; Keisuke Kohno; Shinji Hashimoto; Kiyoshi Fukunaga; Tatsuya Oda; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy Based on Cross-Sectional Images.

Authors:  Ye Rim Chang; Jae Seung Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Woo Hyun Jung; Mee Joo Kang; Kyung Bun Lee; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Sara Nobile; Stefano Partelli; Luca Cardinali; Stefano Crippa; Gianpaolo Balzano; Luigi Beretta; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Rectal Gas Volume Measured by Computerized Tomography Identifies Evacuation Disorders in Patients With Constipation.

Authors:  Seon-Young Park; Disha Khemani; Alfred D Nelson; Deborah Eckert; Michael Camilleri
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Impact of the preoperative body composition indexes on intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Kenta Ishii; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Tsuyoshi Igami; Takashi Mizuno; Junpei Yamaguchi; Shunsuke Onoe; Nobuyuki Watanabe; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Decreased Skeletal Muscle Volume Is a Predictive Factor for Poorer Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Motokazu Sugimoto; Michael B Farnell; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick; Mark J Truty; Rory L Smoot; Suresh T Chari; Michael R Moynagh; Gloria M Petersen; Rickey E Carter; Naoki Takahashi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.