Literature DB >> 28776157

An Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer Survival.

Steven Walczak1, Vic Velanovich2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the development of an artificial neural network (ANN) method for predicting the survival likelihood of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. The ANN predictive model should produce results with a 90% sensitivity.
METHODS: A prospective examination of the records for 283 consecutive pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients is used to identify 219 records with complete data. These records are then used to create two unique samples which are then used to train and validate an ANN predictive model. Numerous network architectures are evaluated, following recommended ANN development protocols.
RESULTS: Several backpropagation-trained ANNs were produced that satisfied the 90% sensitivity requirement. An ANN model with over a 91% sensitivity is selected because even though it did not have the highest sensitivity, it was able to achieve over 38% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: ANN models can accurately predict the 7-month survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, both with and without resection, at a 91% sensitivity and 38% specificity. This implies that ANN models may be useful objective decision tools in complex treatment decisions. This information may be used by patients and surgeons in determining optimal treatment plans that minimize regret and improve the quality of life for these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural network; Backpropagation; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic cancer; Survival prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28776157     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3518-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  36 in total

1.  Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: the emperor has no clothes?

Authors:  Edward L Bradley
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  Using procedural codes to supplement risk adjustment: a nonparametric learning approach.

Authors:  Zeeshan Syed; Ilan Rubinfeld; Joe H Patton; Jennifer Ritz; Jack Jordan; Andrea Doud; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Quality of life and performance status in patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich; Ira Wollner
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Sutton; Gregory C Wilson; Ian M Paquette; Koffi Wima; Dennis J Hanseman; R Cutler Quillin; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Syed A Ahmad; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Preoperative frailty and quality of life as predictors of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Adrienne Saxton; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The association of quality-of-life measures with malignancy and survival in patients with pancreatic pathology.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Surgical resection versus palliative chemoradiotherapy for the management of pancreatic cancer with local venous invasion: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Abramson; Edward W Swanson; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Artificial neural network for prediction of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: a phase II diagnostic study.

Authors:  Elfriede H Bollschweiler; Stefan P Mönig; Karin Hensler; Stephan E Baldus; Keiichi Maruyama; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Treatment of pancreatic cancer: challenge of the facts.

Authors:  Hans G Beger; Bettina Rau; Frank Gansauge; Bertram Poch; Karl-Heinz Link
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Donald W Robinson; Debra F Eisenberg; David Cella; Ning Zhao; Carla de Boer; Mark DeWitte
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug
View more
  11 in total

1.  A Machine Learning Approach to Screen for Otitis Media Using Digital Otoscope Images Labelled by an Expert Panel.

Authors:  Josefin Sandström; Hermanus Myburgh; Claude Laurent; De Wet Swanepoel; Thorbjörn Lundberg
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  A method for utilizing automated machine learning for histopathological classification of testis based on Johnsen scores.

Authors:  Yurika Ito; Mami Unagami; Fumito Yamabe; Yozo Mitsui; Koichi Nakajima; Koichi Nagao; Hideyuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Irreversible Electroporation in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: How Important Is the New Weapon?

Authors:  Guo Tian; Xueping Liu; Qiyu Zhao; Danxia Xu; Tian'an Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A systematic review of methodological quality of model development studies predicting prognostic outcome for resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alison Bradley; Robert Van Der Meer; Colin J McKay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Establishment and application of an artificial intelligence diagnosis system for pancreatic cancer with a faster region-based convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Shang-Long Liu; Shuo Li; Yu-Ting Guo; Yun-Peng Zhou; Zheng-Dong Zhang; Shuai Li; Yun Lu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Building an Otoscopic screening prototype tool using deep learning.

Authors:  Devon Livingstone; Aron S Talai; Justin Chau; Nils D Forkert
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence for the management of pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Myrte Gorris; Sanne A Hoogenboom; Michael B Wallace; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.559

Review 8.  Recent advances in artificial intelligence for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Hayashi; Norio Uemura; Kazuki Matsumura; Liu Zhao; Hiroki Sato; Yuta Shiraishi; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Application of artificial intelligence to pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Ruibiao Fu; Qian Shao; Yan Chen; Qinghuang Ye; Sheng Li; Xiongxiong He; Jinhui Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

10.  A prognostic Bayesian network that makes personalized predictions of poor prognostic outcome post resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alison Bradley; Robert Van der Meer; Colin J McKay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.