Literature DB >> 29390789

Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.

Douglas H Keefe1, M Patrick Feeney2, Lisa L Hunter3, Denis F Fitzpatrick1, Chris A Sanford4.   

Abstract

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) responses were measured in normal-hearing adult ears over frequencies from 0.7 to 8 kHz, and analyzed with reflectance/admittance data to measure absorbed sound power and the tympanometric peak pressure (TPP). The mean TPP was close to ambient. TEOAEs were measured in the ear canal at ambient pressure, TPP, and fixed air pressures from 150 to -200 daPa. Both click and chirp stimuli were used to elicit TEOAEs, in which the incident sound pressure level was constant across frequency. TEOAE levels were similar at ambient and TPP, and for frequencies from 0.7 to 2.8 kHz decreased with increasing positive and negative pressures. At 4-8 kHz, TEOAE levels were larger at positive pressures. This asymmetry is possibly related to changes in mechanical transmission through the ossicular chain. The mean TEOAE group delay did not change with pressure, although small changes were observed in the mean instantaneous frequency and group spread. Chirp TEOAEs measured in an adult ear with Eustachian tube dysfunction and TPP of -165 daPa were more robust at TPP than at ambient. Overall, results demonstrate the feasibility and clinical potential of measuring TEOAEs at fixed pressures in the ear canal, which provide additional information relative to TEOAEs measured at ambient pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29390789      PMCID: PMC5785300          DOI: 10.1121/1.5021252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Sun; Mark D Shaver
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear-canal measurements.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of negative middle-ear pressure on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  L Marshall; L M Heller; L J Westhusin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

8.  The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M B Trine; J E Hirsch; R H Margolis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Posture systematically alters ear-canal reflectance and DPOAE properties.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Modupe F Adegoke; Nicholas J Horton; Kevin N Sheth; Jonathan Rosand; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus.

Authors:  J P Wilson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.