Literature DB >> 28025255

Representations of Pitch and Timbre Variation in Human Auditory Cortex.

Emily J Allen1, Philip C Burton2, Cheryl A Olman2, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Pitch and timbre are two primary dimensions of auditory perception, but how they are represented in the human brain remains a matter of contention. Some animal studies of auditory cortical processing have suggested modular processing, with different brain regions preferentially coding for pitch or timbre, whereas other studies have suggested a distributed code for different attributes across the same population of neurons. This study tested whether variations in pitch and timbre elicit activity in distinct regions of the human temporal lobes. Listeners were presented with sequences of sounds that varied in either fundamental frequency (eliciting changes in pitch) or spectral centroid (eliciting changes in brightness, an important attribute of timbre), with the degree of pitch or timbre variation in each sequence parametrically manipulated. The BOLD responses from auditory cortex increased with increasing sequence variance along each perceptual dimension. The spatial extent, region, and laterality of the cortical regions most responsive to variations in pitch or timbre at the univariate level of analysis were largely overlapping. However, patterns of activation in response to pitch or timbre variations were discriminable in most subjects at an individual level using multivoxel pattern analysis, suggesting a distributed coding of the two dimensions bilaterally in human auditory cortex. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Pitch and timbre are two crucial aspects of auditory perception. Pitch governs our perception of musical melodies and harmonies, and conveys both prosodic and (in tone languages) lexical information in speech. Brightness-an aspect of timbre or sound quality-allows us to distinguish different musical instruments and speech sounds. Frequency-mapping studies have revealed tonotopic organization in primary auditory cortex, but the use of pure tones or noise bands has precluded the possibility of dissociating pitch from brightness. Our results suggest a distributed code, with no clear anatomical distinctions between auditory cortical regions responsive to changes in either pitch or timbre, but also reveal a population code that can differentiate between changes in either dimension within the same cortical regions.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/371284-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heschl's gyrus; auditory cortex; fMRI; perception; pitch; timbre

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025255      PMCID: PMC5296797          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2336-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Neural correlates of timbre change in harmonic sounds.

Authors:  V Menon; D J Levitin; B K Smith; A Lembke; B D Krasnow; D Glazer; G H Glover; S McAdams
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre.

Authors:  C L Krumhansl; P Iverson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Cortical pitch regions in humans respond primarily to resolved harmonics and are located in specific tonotopic regions of anterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam Norman-Haignere; Nancy Kanwisher; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sustained responses for pitch and vowels map to similar sites in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Stefan Uppenkamp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A new method of calculating auditory excitation patterns and loudness for steady sounds.

Authors:  Zhangli Chen; Guangshu Hu; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.

Authors:  Anders Eklund; Thomas E Nichols; Hans Knutsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Erika Skoe; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Richard Ashley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  30 in total

1.  Relative contribution of pitch and brightness to the auditory kappa effect.

Authors:  Nicolas Marty; Maxime Marty; Micha Pfeuty
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-22

2.  Cortical Correlates of Attention to Auditory Features.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Philip C Burton; Juraj Mesik; Cheryl A Olman; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

5.  Pitch, Timbre and Intensity Interdependently Modulate Neural Responses to Salient Sounds.

Authors:  Emine Merve Kaya; Nicolas Huang; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Auditory Selectivity for Spectral Contrast in Cortical Neurons and Behavior.

Authors:  Nina L T So; Jacob A Edwards; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Learning metrics on spectrotemporal modulations reveals the perception of musical instrument timbre.

Authors:  Etienne Thoret; Baptiste Caramiaux; Philippe Depalle; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-11-30

9.  Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Agathe Pralus; Lesly Fornoni; Andrew J Oxenham; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Individual Variability in Functional Organization of the Human and Monkey Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Jianxun Ren; Ting Xu; Danhong Wang; Meiling Li; Yuanxiang Lin; Franziska Schoeppe; Julian S B Ramirez; Ying Han; Guoming Luan; Luming Li; Hesheng Liu; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.