Literature DB >> 28024436

International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes.

Gary D Rogers1, Jill E Thistlethwaite2, Elizabeth S Anderson3, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren4, Ruby E Grymonpre5, Monica Moran6, Dujeepa D Samarasekera7.   

Abstract

Regulatory frameworks around the world mandate that health and social care professional education programs graduate practitioners who have the competence and capability to practice effectively in interprofessional collaborative teams. Academic institutions are responding by offering interprofessional education (IPE); however, there is as yet no consensus regarding optimal strategies for the assessment of interprofessional learning (IPL). The Program Committee for the 17th Ottawa Conference in Perth, Australia in March, 2016, invited IPE champions to debate and discuss the current status of the assessment of IPL. A draft statement from this workshop was further discussed at the global All Together Better Health VIII conference in Oxford, UK in September, 2016. The outcomes of these deliberations and a final round of electronic consultation informed the work of a core group of international IPE leaders to develop this document. The consensus statement we present here is the result of the synthesized views of experts and global colleagues. It outlines the challenges and difficulties but endorses a set of desired learning outcome categories and methods of assessment that can be adapted to individual contexts and resources. The points of consensus focus on pre-qualification (pre-licensure) health professional students but may be transferable into post-qualification arenas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28024436     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  18 in total

1.  Team-Based Decision-Making in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Are Pre-Licensure Healthcare Students "Collaborative Practice-Ready"?

Authors:  Renee Dagenais; Shane Ashley Pawluk; Daniel Rainkie; Kyle John Wilby
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2018-11-02

2.  Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Pharmacist Interprofessional Competencies Tool.

Authors:  Lisa A Salvati; Lisa M Meny; Margaret C de Voest; David R Bright; Kari L Vavra-Janes; Mark A Young; Shelby E Kelsh; Michelle J Sahr; Greg S Wellman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A novel, integrated curriculum for dental hygiene-therapists and dentists.

Authors:  C McIlwaine; Z L S Brookes; D Zahra; K Ali; S Zaric; G Jones; L A Belfield
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  A Multilevel Model for Evaluating Interprofessional Learning.

Authors:  Joseph B House; Jacob Cedarbaum; Sally A Santen
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Effectiveness and Dissemination of the Interprofessional Pediatric Pain PRN Curriculum.

Authors:  Renee C B Manworren; Megan Basco
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Implementing interprofessional learning curriculum: how problems might also be answers.

Authors:  Maree O'Keefe; Helena Ward
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Health Care as a Team Sport?-Studying Athletics to Improve Interprofessional Collaboration.

Authors:  Anthony P Breitbach; Scott Reeves; Simon N Fletcher
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-18

8.  The impact of an interprofessional training ward on the development of interprofessional competencies: study protocol of a longitudinal mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Johanna Mink; Anika Mitzkat; André L Mihaljevic; Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke; Burkhard Götsch; Jochen Schmidt; Katja Krug; Cornelia Mahler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Development of a national medical leadership competency framework: the Dutch approach.

Authors:  Wouter A Keijser; Henricus J M Handgraaf; Liz M Isfordink; Vincent T Janmaat; Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Julia M J S Verkade; Sietse Wieringa; Celeste P M Wilderom
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Characteristics of two questionnaires used to assess interprofessional learning: psychometrics and expert panel evaluations.

Authors:  Samuel Edelbring; Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren; Desiree Wiegleb Edström
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.